Do you mean everyone in general or just Ewwenorfolk?

No chance. If that was Saints/Warrington/Wakefield etc etc I would be putting forward the same argument. It was lucky/flukey/jammy that that missed tackle occured in the dying moments, right near the tryline.

The try wasn't a fluke, but Amos knocking on was the bit of luck Leeds needed. It was a missed tackle - simples...

Having read your posts, it would seem that you think the try was flukey purely because it was in the 79th minute. Surely you're not basing your entire argument on this

It was a good try, even if it was a flukey one. But to call it a genius piece of play is ridiculous.

Will Lee Smith go tell his mum if I don't say sorry.

After all he couldn't take living a few hundred miles away from his mummy could he?

I bet Bradford supporters are cringing at Ewwenorfolk. What an embarrassment

Last week Saints scored 14 tries on the back of 33 missed tackles by HKR. Were Saints lucky?

That was my initial thought.

But, thinking about it, clamping down on kickers being taken out late means that players aren't allowed to jump in at kickers and claim they were committed. The whole point of the rule is to protect kickers being hit without the ball.

No because they happened consistently throughout the game.

There's a big difference between missing shedloads of tackles throughout the game and standing solid for most of it then missing a vital tackle in the last minute.

Nah, they wasn't Wigan fans, Wigan's fans are all angels, they were more likely Wire fans in Wigan tops.

So basically the main message is that missed tackles are flukey and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with a lack of tackling skill or tiredness. Because they are, of course, purely dependent on the fluke factor

By Damo.

If he was knackered then Smith didn't make him miss, fatigue did.