You fear us most, don't you?

You'd be right to, especially when we have a better recent record of getting over the final hurdle than you. You know your team falls at the last.

You really need to bin your book of sick comments.

Your post annoy's me more than his. I''m more in favour of him being allowed to have his opinion than you trying to strip him of that.

And herein lies the problem with RLFans. The guy is a constant WUM and I'm embarrassed for you that you're actually backing him up. It's even sadder that you didn't get the irony in my post but somehow I'm not surprised.

The lunatics have well and truly taken over the asylum.

Not sure what’s the more concerning. London’s inabilities in the first half, hull putting the. Cue in their rack in the second or the number of rovers fans on here trying to convince people 11,400 is a poor attendance for a Thursday night game.

Yes embarrassing even by your low standards.
Just remind us all again ruuBron108 which team beat you earlier in the season

Thursday night vs London - that is a very impressive attendance. Well done Hull.

I think the argument this week isn't whether it should have been Leeds v Rovers or Saints v Wigan - it clearly shoudl have been both of them and last night's game shouldn't have been close to TV.

I am a hull kr fan I do not like hull but 11 400 on a Thursday night is great

You really don`t like Hull do you,what happened ,a player run off with your mrs?

What would be embarrassing would be televising a game on which a cricket score had been scored - hardly going to draw people in or keep their interest.

9,090 How embarrassing that the best team in the league by some distance could only get marginally more that 9k v London.

But then again, your opinion, to which you are fully entitled, carries as much gravitas as Baldricks.

9,090 was the attendance at the St Helens v London game earlier this season. I have no idea if they were mutes, I wasn't there.

Mr obsessed much? The fan putting your attendance down is a saints fan.

Try again