No point having a vr if there's no way he'll reverse a decision. Shocking decision

How much clear evidence does the video ref need. You can clearly see that was a try.

Can't believe the video ref never gave that.

Our game is a joke. Truly shocking decision there

Wow, sorry Saints you have been totally done there.

Wire the better side but very, very lucky to get there, Saints were hard done to there!

If that isn't clear evidence, I'm not sure what is.

FFS. That's just embarrassing.

Before any Wire fans get worked up I thought they were the better team and fully deserve their place in the Grand Final.

But that video ref decision is just ridiculous. It was clearly a try. Clearly. What's the point of the video ref if it's going to ignore the video evidence in favour of the ref's view.

Time to scrap the video ref now if our game is to be taken seriously, it's beyond a joke now!

Great occasion and a brilliant battle from both sides ruined by stupid decisions!

I thought Warrington were the better team overall though St Helens came back well. Warrington got lucky though, if I was a St Helens fan I would genuinely feel as though I'd had my pocket pinched.

Just listened to KC's interview, I have to say he was very diplomatic.

Well it probably was a try but you don't actually see the ball touch the line just as we were going to see it touch a knee obscures the view.

The only thing I can think is I didn't actually see the frame with the ball on the line, even though a split second later it obviously was.

If they don't get rid of the V.R. at least get rid of the refs take on it & let the V.R. make an unbiased decision.

Does the game need video refs? 90%+ of matches seem to work just fine without.

Not as if that sh*te decision was a one-off, they happen every week or two, albeit some being more significant than others.

You do. View from behind is clear as day. Its actually past and over the line.

Jesus. With the Lineham "try" and Peyroux's not being awarded, Saints have been well and truly shafted.