On what grounds do you think the try should have been disallowed?

Indeed, the ball of the chest isnt a knock in. Only the head or the hands is it a knock on.

Mind, you think thats mad, this week the Review panel thought that it was Paul Whatuira's own fault he got spear tackled.

It is obviously in the rules but I think a rethink is needed when hands and head are a knock on but hitting the chest in the middle of these body parts (with arms out stretched ready to catch) is deemed ok.

The head was only recently changed too.

Nothing wrong with chesting the ball down to controll it imo.

I agree with that. What was he playing at? They didn't turn him over, they just lifted him and he bent himself over and almost snapped his neck on the floor. Should have been a knock on.

Clearly we were robbed

He hardly 'controlled' it though. It bounced off his chest unintentionally and threw everyone. Think the ruling needs to be looked at as that last night wasn't a 'proper' try IMO.

It happens.

Rarely, very rarely.

Hardly needs a rule change for a fluke try.

Still, If the same thing happens at wembley... 1 Minute to go an its Hudds 30 - 28 Wire. Briers throws a ball which bounces off Kings chest flies through Hudderfields defending line and the Wire winger jumps on it. Video ref spends a few minutes looking at it and then gives it. Would be a joke of a way to decide a challenge cup final.... Ok its unlikely to happen but imagine the state of rlfans if it did

It would be their own fault for scoring 30 points and still not winning.

Yeah, thats the sort of thing wire do

Not it isn't.

You sure, whats your reasoning?



says the rules