About right for me. Reckon he'll get 2 games with good disciplinary record [size(even if he is a niggly sod)[/size.

I thought with Grade C and above, you don't have the option of an EGP?

Wrong, A-C can submit EGP.

As long as Sir Kev isn't playing on Friday night against the greatest team ever to play out of Barton Graveyard Stadium, I don't care how many more games he misses after that..

To be fair, he is the Gary Lineker of RL, fantastic talent and gentleman who annoys only a few

2 game suspension following early guilty plea confirmed.

link????

Leeds Rhinos official twitter

https://twitter.com/leedsrhinos/status/ ... 4203271168

https://twitter.com/leedsrhinos/status/ ... 4203271168

Right decision IMO.

Fair decision based only on his good record. It was out of character.
Sure they'll be an over reaction from some because he's called Kevin Sinfield.

I shouldn't wonder because it's irrelevant BUT if the CC cup was in 2 weeks would he still have copped a 2 match ban.
Bad faith in the justice system on my part and would say No!

Nowt against Leeds or Sinfield - but that decision stinks.

Obviously nothing to do with the CC game in 3 weeks

EGP - fair enough
Sent off - fair enough

However out of character etc... there was intent and an aggressive act.

Homophobic abuse or spear tackle (Hardaker and Ferres) = 5 game ban (plus sending off for Ferres)
Deliberate head butt (Sinfield) = 2 game ban and sending off

Get the logic - do ya - do ya???

RFL maintains their usual standard of transparency, fairness and never ducks a difficult decision for the sake of the wider game then - NOT!!!

So to sum up the last 20-odd pages -witnessed him do it 3 times now[/i. and

And after all that carnage the lousy RFL only hand out a 2 match ban.

Given the grade of the offense. Then 2 matches was probably the only outcome.

He pled guilty has a good record. If 3 was the maximum and they gave him 3 what would be the point of pleading guilty and having a good record. May as well draw the process out.

If people want to argue anything the only thing worth arguing is the original grading.

As for those comparing it to a spear tackle. Get real a spear tackle can kill you.

As for the homophobic abuse to the ref. Again the game demands high punishments for any abuse of the ref and I'm fine with that.

If it was homophobic abuse of a player you would probably get a lot less, again rightly so in my humble opinion. I want player on player to be less than player on ref.

If he had headbutted a ref, he would have been looking at a season out.