Because, its the only money they get

I might have miss heard this at some point, but dont the rfl give sl clubs 100k each towards youth devolopement?if thats the case then those monies will stop now and that money could be being used to strengthen the rest of the pro game

It would seem pretty backward. Giving the most money to the clubs who need it least. Would seem a surefire recipe for the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer.

Seems a bit of an afterthought. Bit hard to budget and shouldnt really have our amateur funding dependent on the excess of some in SL/

SL clubs still do youth development (not enough and not brilliantly admittedly)

Read it again

Would still seem backward to reward clubs for failing financially.

Clubs should be rewarded however for specifically doing the things we want them to do though.

Yes it is a strange one, rewarding failure, like they do in the NFL

Can we stop strangling the life out of the lower leagues?

10 years ago Leigh were averaging 3-3.5k in the lower league. What have we lost since then that has seen our average drop to 1.5k?

For me it's competitive fixtures. The fixtures we do play in don't feel like they mean anything. There's next to no reward for winning anything, so it's difficult to get excited about being crowned 15th best team in the country.

Secondly, I remember big games with big crowds against Widnes, Hull KR, Oldham, Rochdale, Swinton, Salford, Huddersfield, Featherstone, Whitehaven, Batley, Hunslet & Dewsbury, all over a 5 year period. Now many of these clubs are shadows of their former selves. Oldham, Rochdale, Swinton, Whitehaven, Dewsbury & Hunslet are now all close to being dead. Widnes, Hull KR, Salford & Huddersfield are all in the closed shop top flight.

These days, Leigh fans get excited about games v Featherstone or v Halifax, everything else is a let down on one level or another. For example, Batley and Sheffield are good teams, but virtually none of their fans ever turn up at LSV to see their team play.

Yes it works well if you have money queing up to replace them, but we dont, and wont have, unless of course you improve the next lot down, then you might get better results from those failing

And the circle of life is complete

So not only now do you want us to be taking funding from the top of SL to the bottom, we now also need funding to subsidise the lower tiers as well. So in short you are wanting four or five clubs to fund the entire game from top to bottom in the hope that that will produce some clubs who can challenge them. Good plan that.

You also seem to be forgetting that the best market for the league as a whole probably wouldnt be any of the clubs currently in the championship bar Sheffield. It would surely be cheaper and easier just to invest in Sheffield.

Good idea, certain to work, cant think why we havent tried that one before?

Look, I think a change of structure isnt going to work, I posted as such at the start of the thread , but neither is the current one working either, so my solution is to put some pressure on the lower SL clubs to improve, as I understood it, thats what everybody wants to happen

There are no new mega clubs around the corner, Salford will fail looking at the way Mr Koukash is heading, because he looks to want instant results, and that wont happen, or if it does it will probably be on the back of an influx of overseas players

Im not saying they dont contribute at all, but out of all three levels of the game they contribute the least, and considering that all three levels of the game are desperate for investment I cant see why we would be prioritising investing in the part of the game that has and will contribute the least.

As i said before, we dont have an infinite amount of money, every penny we spend has an opportunity cost, if we invest x amount in the championships we dont invest x amount elsewhere, investment in any part of the game doesnt only have to be worthwhile it has to be the best use of that money.