Mason in general was awful. He made countless errors throughout the game that seriously affected the Giants momentum.

Nothing from the refs? Are you on a wind up?

Superb, as always. You start spotting lots of folk in rugby gear and fancy dress miles away from Wembley and I didn't see a hint of anything my granny would disapprove of. Saw fans in the jerseys of every SL club (except Salford, oddly) and nearly all championship clubs. Also quite a number of French fans and at least a dozen in Welsh union club jerseys. I think the party mood was reflected in the friendliness of the stewards & police.

We saw some Salford supporters, they were represented!

Were you watching the same game as Robbie Paul? 'cos in the match we were all watching he had the ball in his right arm, was brought down on his right side and almost all of his upper right arm hit the ground.

Then he reached over the line.

Text book double movement.

Just as it should be.

The Giants reminded me of the Bulls in 1997, just couldnt get out of 2nd gear.

As far as I'm concerned the video ref decision to deny Lunt was as wrong as you'll see. That would have changed the course of the game as Hudds were on top and on a huge roll on at the time and could have run in a couple on the back of it.
There's also a strong case for the Hodgson try. Yes the runner hit a defender but he was simply running his line.

It's my opinion that Warrington got the more 50/50 decisions than Huddersfield. You might not agree. That's life.

Fwiw, Wire were the better side on the day and deserved the win. Hudds crucified themselves with errors and possible nerves and Wire played it perfectly for those 20 minutes.

Since when was 'simply running his line' an excuse for obstruction? He was running his line, it was a poor line, it obstructed a defender.

I agree with you on the lunt one but this one was very very harsh.

All I said was there's a case for it. I've seen them given, I've seen them denied. This one was denied. Would the defender have prevented the try if unobstructed? Possibly - Briers had to adjust his defence when he was suddenly 1-on-1. Probably the correct decision overall but I've seen very similar tries given.

The Lunt decision was a disgrace.

What about when Carvell went over and Ganson said the tackle had been completed? At no time did Ganson call that tackle complete. He didn't on the radio ear piece at the ground (how cool are they?) and still hasn't on three watches, several rewinds and slow-mo!



The King no try, I agree with the decision but we all know we have seen them given at other times.