They are. And that discussion will already have a thread of its own I'm sure.

is it Peacock?

Rangi Chase

No visa for Hull, No contract from SGI and no unburnt bridges at Cas.

How could he be a West Yorkshire legend? Is he from these parts, has he played as many games as Stuart Dickens, Jamie Peacock?

I could be stretching the definition of legend but, is it Stevo? PLease let it be Stevo.

Few current players have achieved as much as he did as a player.

However I hear it's Ian Kirke.

JJB?

Easy there Nick Griffin, what are you trying to say about Roger?

Rangi is a legend, MOS winner and England international. Plus what would be so "Shocking" about Peacock retiring if he was a dog you would take him to the vet and get him put down.

Stuart Dickens is not a legend and the only thing shocking was that he didn't retire when Salford booted him.

Has to be Ronnie Rhino, since his separation from Rita and the kids he has not been the same. His fluctuation in height from one week to another (some times tall and thin sometimes a little shorter and wider) clearly provides he has been carrying some sort of injury or split personality.

His recent absail did not go as planned and lack of attendance at many away grounds this season must have effected him mentally.

He was also jealous of the fact the team wore Pink & Grey on occasions while he was stuck in a Blue and Ambler kit all year round.

Happy Retirement Ronnie

Who?

Why should they ?

Is that a serious question.

A production line of young players, allows a sustainable development of a club over a number of years.

Providing you have quality youngsters. Without them it wouldn't work.

They is also no rule stating that every member of your squad must come through your own academy. If that was the case, we would have a very boring league which would eventually die a death.

Every team in every sport in the world would rather take a proven player as opposed to giving a youngster a shot. With attendances really poor these days people won't pay £20 to see a youngster trying his hardest, people want quality and a winning team.

Really? I'd assumed this explained the continued selection of Richard Horne.

Obviously you need good young players not sure that needed explaining.

Comparing a proven player to a youngster you are missing the point.