Surely any money problems in a sport that struggles anyway is a problem.

according to the article they made a 100k loss.

The club made an operating loss of £324,945, largely due to the unexpected expense of £500k for the South Stand. The figure of £10,599,073 doesn't include the final installment of the sale of the cricket ground (those were on a previous year's accounts IIRC).

Overall, I can't imagine many clubs have increased their turnover by £760k in the past year.

lets kill KD asap!!!

No there isn't. For tax purposes making a loss is better than making a huge profit.

For business purposes making a profit is better than making a loss

our fans moan a lot about our board

but in the context of the below (posted/collated by someone else on the Hull board) they are doing a good job!

Hull FC PROFIT £185,000

Bradford - Loss £17,000
Warrington - Loss £212,000
Cas - Loss £369,000
Saints - Loss £449,000
Rovers (2007) Loss £478,000
Wigan - Loss £592,000 (although debt they owed being written off of £1,175,000 gave them a net profit of £444,000)
Salford - Loss £832,000 (underwritten by Wilkinson)
Huddersfield - Loss £1,377,000 (underwritten by Ken Davy)
Harlequins - Loss £1,819,000 (underwritten by Lenegan and D Hughes)

I think clubs should have an independent audit every year looking at their accounts.

Clubs that are losing money or taking on debt that is not for ground improvements or training/youth facilities should either be deducted points or have their cap lowered.

Dear Mr Bank Manager,

Please extend our overdraft facility for the next 12 months. I'm delighted to say we've not had to pay any tax this year becuase we lost half a million pounds.

Kind regards

The Chairman

Definitely can see one, though it's not politically correct to name which one

tickets, TV rights, merchandise, corporate hospitality that kind of thing

Leeds as a club operated at a profit last year if we discount the investment in the southstand which is a one off expenditure,

the rebuilding of the southstand will put the club into the red, though not by a great deal, which should leave the club then operating at a healthy profit

i think it still retains some ownership of part of the cricket side of things, something to do with the bar/catering/corporate facilities

About time too , when are they rebuilding the other 65 % of the ground ?

As far as ownership goes Leeds own the RL ground, Yorkshire the cricket ground & hotel and the bits in between are split one way or another.

I think Leeds manage the bulk of the complex, even the bits they don't own any more, as the corporate non game day side seems to be still done centrally (which makes logistical sense as it would be fairly futile for YCCC to have set up a separate department to deal with something that was already in place and highly succesful). Revenue presumably gets split on some defined formula based on who owns which bit, what the event was etc. A significant amount of Leeds post-match activity is in the cricket Long Bar for example. If there was a financial disincentive to use that facility this kind of stuff could probably be transferred to a Rhinos-owned bit of the ground (e.g. Lewis Jones suite in the Carnegie Stand for sake of argument) but thankfully they have obviously got an arrangement which doesn't nonsensically split the use of the complex in that way.

Leeds are lucky that they have corporate facilities to call on on game nights which make the every other club in the league look ridiculous in comparison but also that they have the local demand to fill those on Friday evenings and also be well used through the week. Well I say lucky - but it cost a hell of a lot to put that infrastructure in place and so the club has every right to reap the benefits of it now.