Is Hudgell going to be called to account for his thinly veiled suggestion of bias directed at Jon Sharp?

If not, why not?

If that statement had come from a coach immediately following a defeat, he would at the very least be asked to explain his comments by the RFL.

Personally I would scrap it and accept the on field referee's decision.

I doubt the RFL would want to prolong this any further, how can they demand and explanation from Hudgell and sweep last Saturday under the carpet. They are already hypocrites in how they treat coaches who question a referee, but never sanction one for a poor performance (not including the token removals for one game on a VR). I am sure they will want this to go away soon.

I wouldn't bet against Hicks giving a couple of howlers in our favour on Sunday to balance it up and stifle the issue.

Agreed. If The weekends game has not been on sky, I doubt there would have been the much of an issue raised.

With the Video ref, it should be either al all games or none, IMO

Nice to see some perspective there. So actually Ganson's outrageous decision last year really wasn't all that bad when you just put it down to positioning. A stark contrast from him having always had it in for Hull FC which seemed a popular theme at the time.

At which point, everyone else will say that it's because Hudgell had a pop at Jon Sharp, even when it clearly isn't. Which is why he needed to keep his mouth shut.

Of course there is a difference to a split second decision (even if its plainly obvious to on lookers its wrong )to being able to review a passage of play several times from several angles.

But by the tone of your posts you appear unable to comprehend rational debate

Exactly-You need to be saying this to your fans who keep going on about karma.

At the end of the day, irrespective of how the error manifests, the two being compared ended up with the same result, and unjust 6 points.

That's the karma

How long do you reckon that would last, with multiple camera angles showing incorrect decisions by the on-field ref at every televised game? How long before demands for the VR to come back to sort out these 'ridiculous' errors?

While you're clearly doing it TIC, the karma thing, which ever side it comes from, is the most apalling . Why can't people just admit to enjoying a bit of schadenfreude, rather than hiding behind some one-sided notion of mystical justice? I'm not even going to exempt Buddhists, because the actions are the official's and the consequences referred to are for the team/club/fans.

What goes around, comes around... and around and around. Next time it happens to Hull, I'll laugh, as I did last time - not because I really believe they deserve it, but simply because I'm a , and it is all part of the fun.
Being a is one thing, a smug quite another, IMO.

You realise of course that in the context used 'karma' has nothing to do with mysticism and is just shorthand for 'what goes around comes around'? Or schadenfruede, even.