FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Wakefield and Castleford Stadium |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Average attendance 2018 :
Leeds 12,807
Hull FC 12,175
Wigan 11,773
St Helens 11,479
Warrington 10,088
Catalans 8,354
Castleford 7,848
Hull KR 7,965
Huddersfield 5,721
Wakefield 5,244
Widnes 4,898
Salford 2,966
5 , 244 Average in a 11,000 capacity stadium . Maybe the venture is not financially economical.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: My Mate Ronnie "Average attendance 2018
If you are going to troll do your homework. The capacity is limited to just over 7k for safety reasons. Oh and we run with 150k of our sky money withheld due to the ground not being up to scratch and still compete without spending what we don’t have
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: My Mate Ronnie "Average attendance 2018
So an extra 500 fans in a ground that holds 25,000 is financially viable?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1872 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I think its a case of shared stadium or stay where you are.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 5139 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Huddersfield1895 "I think its a case of shared stadium or stay where you are.'"
Yep, you've just about covered all the options.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Tricky2309 "Name me one other club who have built a new ground or redeveloped the existing one without council or developer hand outs. You can’t and therefore it’s not trinity’s fault that the council are incompetent and the particular developers in our case are morally bankrupt.
How could the club have done things differently that would have changed the position?'"
Leeds have. Saints did although with chairman assistance.
I haven’t said Wakefield are unique in this but in the end if Wakefield could finance their own stadium or redevelopment they wouldn’t be in as bad a position. So their lack of financial input IS a barrier to them getting a new stadium or redeveloping.
The club could have invested money in Belle Vue over the last 40-50 years instead of spending it all on players and short term gain. That’s what they could have done differently. The sport is hamstrung now because of the short term decisions made by the clubs in the past.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17982 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Huddersfield1895 "I think its a case of shared stadium or stay where you are.'"
You still sharing with Sheffield
Seriously though, having had land taken from Greenbelt to allow for Industrial development AND a COMMUNITY STADIUM, for this not to happen, aided and abetted by WMDC would be just wrong (on multiple levels).
We have a council and develloper playing the long game, hoping that Trinity just disappear into the ether.
Both the club and it's fans have plenty of fight left in them and EVERY RL and sporting fan should be on the case as well.
IF WMDC are allowed to ignore their obligations, then, who next ??
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Upanunder "That's an easy position to adopt from your ivory tower
Who else in SL built and/or owns their own ground ?
Leeds, St Helens, Cas ?
Warrington via a holding company ?
Hudds have a 20% stake in their football ground holding company
Hull council owned
Widnes council owned
Catalans council owned/local authority/whatever
Leigh council owned
HKR council owned
Salford rent from a 3rd party.
Wigan rent from a football club
The premier sport in the Wakefield district does not have a stadium in which to play it.
With the game being in the state it is and with neither Cas nor Wakey having enough conkers between them to build one their own, what is the answer.
The answer isn't "its their own fault" anymore than it was Hudds, Widnes, Cats, Leigh, Salford, HKR or Wigans own fault.'"
I didn’t say Wakefield we’re anymore at fault than the vast majority of RL clubs who took the same short-sighted decisions not to invest in their stadiums. But that is still Wakefield’s fault. And the situation is still the same, if Wakefield had invested in their stadium over the years they would not be in as bad a position now.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Him "Leeds have. Saints did although with chairman assistance.
I haven’t said Wakefield are unique in this but in the end if Wakefield could finance their own stadium or redevelopment they wouldn’t be in as bad a position. So their lack of financial input IS a barrier to them getting a new stadium or redeveloping.
The club could have invested money in Belle Vue over the last 40-50 years instead of spending it all on players and short term gain. That’s what they could have done differently. The sport is hamstrung now because of the short term decisions made by the clubs in the past.'"
Haven’t Leeds council provided funding for headingly upgrade and I seem to recall saints got some money from langtree/Tesco
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 183 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2014 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Lets not forget that Trinity were told not to bid for Belle Vue by WMDC when it came up for sale recently . How is that their fault?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 5139 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Him "Leeds have. Saints did although with chairman assistance.
I haven’t said Wakefield are unique in this but in the end if Wakefield could finance their own stadium or redevelopment they wouldn’t be in as bad a position. So their lack of financial input IS a barrier to them getting a new stadium or redeveloping.
The club could have invested money in Belle Vue over the last 40-50 years instead of spending it all on players and short term gain. That’s what they could have done differently. The sport is hamstrung now because of the short term decisions made by the clubs in the past.'"
I'm sure I read it somewhere that Wakefield wanted to buy the ground off the Bank of Ireland, only to be told by the leader of WMBC not to bid for it and start a bidding war, as the developers who initially let the club down by renaging on the promise of building a new ground at Newmarket in exchange they wanted to buy Bellevue and develop it for the community.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1196 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: little wayne69 "I'm sure I read it somewhere that Wakefield wanted to buy the ground off the Bank of Ireland, only to be told by the leader of WMBC not to bid for it and start a bidding war, as the developers who initially let the club down by renaging on the promise of building a new ground at Newmarket in exchange they wanted to buy Bellevue and develop it for the community.'"
Ive heard this a few times now & whilst not doubting the veracity of the claim; I’m stunned that fans seem ok with MC’s inactivity. My timeline may be a little off, but I’m sure he, along with just about every wakey fan, had been pretty public in displaying zero faith in Peter Box & WMDC prior to this point. So why just accept being told don’t bid?
Can you imagine if this were your house & someone you didn’t trust at all & who you thought actually wanted to see you wither & die, told you they were going to buy your house back from the bank for you so don’t trouble yourself in trying to get your asset back? It would be absolute madness not to bid; irrespective of what anyone was telling you.
The only understandable reason I can think of is that MC/trinity either didn’t have the funds to buy it back or didn’t want to spend his own/trinity’s funds to buy it back - which as I fan I might have a problem with.
I’m not saying MC doesn’t be have some leeway, as he’s done a remarkable job at wakey, but this doesn’t make him free from criticism & if I were a wakey fan I’d think someone should be asking the question of how/why the club allowed this to happen, rather than simply blaming the pantomime villain of the piece in Box/WMDC.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9079 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote: Tricky2309 "Haven’t Leeds council provided funding for headingly upgrade and I seem to recall saints got some money from langtree/Tesco'"
LCC - no funding though they do hold the lease on the re-vamped stands until the loan is paid off
https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/ ... -1-8811875
|
|
Quote: Tricky2309 "Haven’t Leeds council provided funding for headingly upgrade and I seem to recall saints got some money from langtree/Tesco'"
LCC - no funding though they do hold the lease on the re-vamped stands until the loan is paid off
https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/ ... -1-8811875
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Clearwing "LCC - no funding though they do hold the lease on the re-vamped stands until the loan is paid off
Ok but my point still stands no council involvement no funding. Carter has repeated on more than one occasion that if wdmc borrow the money to build the community stadium, trinity would pay the interest on the loan until such time as the council recoup the cost from the developer
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 1470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: steadygetyerboots-on "Ive heard this a few times now & whilst not doubting the veracity of the claim; I’m stunned that fans seem ok with MC’s inactivity. My timeline may be a little off, but I’m sure he, along with just about every wakey fan, had been pretty public in displaying zero faith in Peter Box & WMDC prior to this point. So why just accept being told don’t bid?
Can you imagine if this were your house & someone you didn’t trust at all & who you thought actually wanted to see you wither & die, told you they were going to buy your house back from the bank for you so don’t trouble yourself in trying to get your asset back? It would be absolute madness not to bid; irrespective of what anyone was telling you.
The only understandable reason I can think of is that MC/trinity either didn’t have the funds to buy it back or didn’t want to spend his own/trinity’s funds to buy it back - which as I fan I might have a problem with.
I’m not saying MC doesn’t be have some leeway, as he’s done a remarkable job at wakey, but this doesn’t make him free from criticism & if I were a wakey fan I’d think someone should be asking the question of how/why the club allowed this to happen, rather than simply blaming the pantomime villain of the piece in Box/WMDC.'" it wouldn't of ended there would it, had they purchased the ground they would of then been pressured then to get it up to scratch and believe me that would cost a fair bit, and it would of been the same WMDC guys pushing this that reduced the holding capacity
|
|
|
|
|
|