I don't have a solution, certainly not a short term one anyway. I know one solution that won't work, culling a shedload of players and bringing in a selection of inferior ones.

Which, where, when?

Functional at his best but shown up tonight, he's not good enough, had his chance and came up short!

Is that some kind of joke?

Your posting is offensive, no one is stupid enough to accept those as acceptible suggestions.

Has he?

I'm struggling to think which game he was outstanding or 'great' in.

Can we safely assume tonight's match was the first one you've watched of the series?

You must have anti leeds bias he was one of the better forwards tonight.

I demand to know who you support?

Why you turning this into a club battle?

He's another who can't put his club feelings behind him, I wonder if there would be more support if JJB played for Wakey and not Leeds.

You're easily offended then!

So Burgess, Brough, Hock shouldn't even be afforded the opportunity?

Watkins, Hardacre, Lomax don't deserve the chance to step up in two years time at the World Cup?

We might as well give up then because there's no one else n the horizon and those I named are proven to be not good enough.

Obviously I have a problem with Leeds that's why I've named two Leeds p,ayers as possible replacements!

I suggest you and Old Faithfull get your heads from up your s.

Well hock and burgess have both played in previous losing international sides, so by your logic - NO LONGER REQUIRED.

Brough has played for scotland so can't start playing for us now. He nailed his colours to the scottish mast, we don't want him.

Watkins, hardacre and lomax, may or may not be good enough. To be continued....

In a word NO!

Your small mindedness might limit your ability to see beyond club colours but don't project that onto me, ta.

But neither Burgess or Hock are approaching their mid thirties and neither have looked old and laboured in this series.