T'other thread

This one is the bitchfest thread

If you dont like it , ignore it

So they have had 70 years to make something of themselves and they havent , time somebody else got a chance



Correct Toulouse being in NL 2 would not help any current NL 2 clubs [ exactly as it will not help any NL 1 clubs either ] but it would still benifit Toulouse , Obviously being excempt from relegation will be benificial to Toulouse because hopefully that is where they will finish [ in a relegation place ]





Correct , same as Salford and 6 behind Celtic , but still more than most other clubs



What community ?

other than winning cups and leagues and such, im not sure what else they could make of themselves





whether it does or it doesnt, for £100k you would expect these clubs and their fans could behave with a bit of grace




if your going to bang on about how much Leigh offers in terms of youth development, you really have no place to moan when they are expected to use it



the people who are stakeholders in RL

Nope





" Here little boy , have these sweeties but dont say nothing to your Mummy and Daddy "





We dont have any , ask Richard in the morning




So that would be the SL clubs , the amatuer clubs , the internatinal federations and thier teams ,

oh and those little useless clubs from backwater pit towns , we musn't forget about them

erm, ok i guess,

i'm sorry, i was under the impression that toulouse were permitted as many aussies as they liked. if this isn't the case then i apologise, but they're still allowed more than most of the other NL1 teams

why is it relevant that they've been around for 70 years? they've joined a new league hierarchy for the first time and have skipped NL2. you can dress it up how you like but it's still fast tracking.

how can a club be helpful to NL1 clubs but not NL2 clubs?



pick your petty insults better next time please. you might end up really offending someone. prick.

they have joined in NL1, there was no way for them to qualify from NL1, what use would it have been to them and NL2 clubs to make them play in NL2 for a year?

and NL1 clubs and NL2 clubs are very different things

An away crowd

You didn't say that

This is what you said




Away you go

Are you really trying to argue there is a meaningful difference between saying

[iNL1 and NL2 arent the same thing[/i

and

[iNL1 and NL2 are different things[/i

are you asking what the differences between NL1 and NL2 are? surely you already know that Starry, one is NL1 and one is NL2, one is the 2nd tier of RFL pyramid one is the 3rd, one is made up of generally bigger clubs than the other, one is a bigger competition than the other, one has better attendances than the other, one has a higher profile than the other, one is in general a bigger league than the other

That's not what you said, you said NL1 and NL2 are very different things, which is not the same as saying they're different things. Lions and tigers are different things but they're not very different things

Stop changing what you posted

You did not post that NL1 and NL 2 are different things

You posted that NL 1 clubs are very[idifferent[/i to NL 2 clubs

Now the thing is ALL clubs be they IN NL 1,NL2 , SL , NRL or elite 1 are different

But to try to make an argument that there is some fundamental difference between NL1 and NL 2 clubs that in some way would effect Toulouse is just bloody stupid

Especially as over the next 3 years Toulouse could potentially play against 4 of the clubs presently in NL 2 NOW and 2 clubs that only a few weeks ago were in NL2

You have also made much in the past of there being a definate major difference between SL and the NL's , but no real difference between NL 1 and NL 2

what a pathetic argument, very, is a completely subjective deliberately none specific word, or could either of you tell me the official level at which very can be applied?

Starbug, i never said there was a major difference between NL1 and NL2 clubs, you need to learn to read what is actually there and not what your desperate to be there

to try and make an argument that there is no fundemental difference between the 2nd and 3rd tiers is idiotic, even for your standards, its down at the likes of barnacle bill or bustinyaballs level, it would take an almost subhuman intellect to think there is no fundemental difference between the two different leagues,

the differences in size, popularity, exposure of NL1 compared to NL2 is huge, not the size of the difference between NL1 and SL, but still pretty large, this will be integral to the financing, funding, and chance of success of the Toulouse project, it would be a negative towards the potential of success for Toulouse for them to have to play in that league for a year,

and you would see that it is the sensible option to put Toulouse in NL1 and not allow them to drop to NL2 if you werent desperate to prove everything is bent so you can perpetuate your conspiracy and dont have to accept Leigh werent good enough

according to you Toulouse will be like a cancer in NL1, dragging support and the credibility of the league downwards because they only aim to use that league to get out of it into a higher league, yet in NL2 Toulouse would be doing exactly the same, you seem positive about putting them in NL2, a league full of clubs with a bit less support, a bit less money and a bit less able to deal with impact you believe Toulouse will have, therefore the clubs in that league will feel the hit much much more,

so by any logical conclusion you would agree Toulouse should be in NL1 rather than NL2, if not for any benefit for Toulouse, but as an altruistic fraternal gesture to your NL2 brothers, or could the more likely be true, and as is common with the people who generally agree with you, and you dont really give a flying f@ck about NL2, you dont give a flying f@ck about the game, and dont give a flying f@ck about the game outside of Leigh, and you decisions and opinions arent formed by judging whats in the best interests of the game, but the best interests of Leigh, and when we read your opinions it is always in the knowledge that if you were honest with yourself, you would choose leigh over the game everytime, and would even be in favour of doing something that wasnt in the games best interests (and would in fact be a negative for the game) as long as it benefitted Leigh Centaurions