*edited for accuracy.

the IRB multiply the real number of viewers by 4 for each game, then aggregate it so yes its a lie

how much are the company paying you to lie?

to compare, 40 million viewers then watch our origin series if you want to multiply it by 4.

and thats just 3 games.

for example the real figure for the union WC final is 22 million viewers in england!


in comparison a single game of origin gets 3.4 million viewers

heck if we want to lie like union do you can get a figure of hundreds of millions watching our RLWC!

maybe we should just lie as well.

the Super Bowl (NFL) had over 100 million viewers in the US alone.

Compared to the massive 33 million for the Union WC final, the NFL looks a bit sick eh

Unionites.

OPINION......a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
FACT.....something that actually exists; reality; truth

Now, your IRB match statement falls into the first of the above quotes from the dictionary.......as do most of your posts. The published figures that are used to sell advertising and sponsorship on the other hand, fall into the second.

Unless of course the dictionary is a complete load of bollox in your OPINION

hey succesful sports dont take the real number of viewers for something, multiply it by 4 and then aggregate it for the whole tournament

if soccer did that it would come out with something like 4 trillion viewers.

succesful sports dont lie

I respect the NFL, they done the same thing as RL done and told the IRB to go @#$% itself

That's your Opinion...not an actual fact. Refer to the disctionary explanations above again if you're having trouble with the difference between fact and opnion

ill repeat for the union troll, succesful sports dont lie like union does!

so how many watch the soccer WC - 4 trillion?
or the cricket world cup ? trillions?
or the NFL?

seriously union can lie all it wants to, but its world cup isnt a big event.