Wigan's defence was awesome for 99% of that game. A good, controlled performance, well executed and well disciplined.

Alibert wasn't great, but let's not pretend he changed the result. Good and bad decisions for both teams. The 'forward' pass to Burrow was poor but not a 'try-scoring' pass as someone posted - he still had to collect or kick the ball on and finish it, with McIlorum on his shoulder.

Can always tell you've done Leeds over when they start getting stroppy and niggly.

Unfortunately amateur officials are all we've got.

Nothing like a Wigan win to wake up Saddo

Cite the officials all you want. The simple fact is, Leeds didn't remotely test Wigan.

Team in WCC losing the game before shocker.

Leeds fail to beat Wigan 5th time in a row, shocker!

Isn't it usually team losing game after WCC shocker?

Wigan where very good tonight, considering we had carmont, farrell, prescott and fielden missing not a bad effort. We all know wigan will be up there this year.

Leeds tend to win when it matters though.

What, like at wembley? have Leeds ever beaten Wigan in a final?

Wigan 6 - 0 Leeds

in major finals suggests otherwise.

I said this when Leeds won the Grand Final but the only reason they won - or got remotely close to the final was Rob Burrow, take him out of the game and Leeds offer little in attack

Wigan controlled Burrow tonight and Leeds didnt look like scoring

Chomp, chomp! Leeds have been much more successful than Wigan in recent years. I don't suppose they give a tuppeny t who they beat in the many grand finals they've contested.

At least half of these were when Wigan were the only full time pro team in the country, so when you consider the full picture, it's a little more balanced than you'd like to paint.

Wigan were by far the better team tonight, but you don't win SL in round 2...

Leeds went full-time professional before Wigan did. The 0 against Leeds suggests there's no balance at all.