NRL? more like news ltd but you are more or less correct.

under the ARL we had 4 queensland teams and perth.

we had 4 teams disapear

in qld

do you understand

not in queensland.

we had 2 ARL teams disappear.

Hasn't Singos sale of the marketing rights to the Mariners in effect made it very hard or atleast very, very expensive for a club to go to the Central Coast now?

North Sydney still own a share in the stadium iirc.

Believe the NS Leagues Club owned 20%. Though no-one seems to have mentioned it in the last couple of years.

look here . these are the teams gone from queensland . gold coast GIANTS.GLADIATORS.SEAGULLS.brisbane - QUEENSLAND CRUSHERS so that is 4 teams. thanyou very much broncos for fiucking it up . go too hell broncos

I wouldn't worry tbh, any stadium management worth their salt want as many events as possible.

To be fair most people class the Gold Coast Giants/Seagulls/Chargers as one team because it was always the Gold Coast ARL team and all it ever did was change ownership a couple of times.

It's be like saying Souths/Manly/Auckland etc all are different teams because they are now privately owned.

wakey wakey, RL has been dominant in NSW and Q'land for 100 years and is still a decade behind AFL on teh National stage!

Another Brisabane team IS NOT EXPANSION. It is simply shoring up the heartlands. After 100 years you would think we would have our only two cities secure by now!

N(ATIONAL)RL. The clues in the name!

how is RL behind AFL when its season has 40 million more viewers on TV than AFL every year.

we are far and away the bigger sport when you look at all fans combined.

being in a state where AFL is dominant has addled your thoughts.

you need to spend some time in queensland & nsw where people dont give a s**t about AFL.

as these states represent the majority of australia, RL is in a very strong position.

another club on the central coast and another in queensland will be massive for the game

no thank too the figkin dronco broncos . evil bacdtards