FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > $1.4 Billion NRL tv deal
201 posts in 14 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: WestCoaster "People throwing around crowd figures for the AFL in this context lack a clue.

Hint for the likes of Sal...

There are

Only some one with their head in the sand would believe that attendances have nothing to do with the TV deal. No TV company wants to show games with half empty stadia - it is one of the issues we have with the CC and FTA coverage in the UK.

All this we are get done over by a television company - it is just a "Heads I win, tails you lose" if RL doesn't get a significantly better deal than the AFL.

RankPostsTeam
International Star188No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2011May 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Head in the sand says the conflict denier.

lol

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: WestCoaster "At the end of the day, that is true.

But it doesn't change the fact if AFL gets more it will still be inequitable.'"


Once again you have you head in the sand - TV companies buy sporting rights to sell subscriptions and advertising.

Just maybe the potential revenue streams that come from AFL coverage are better and have greater potential than that of RL. Rules is in every major city in Australia, RL is played in 3 - one of which is Melbourne. So as a TV company where are you likely to get new subscribers from in Adelaide, Perth a sport with no representation or a sport that has an established following?

It is not all about existing viewers?

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200223 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2023Jun 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: WestCoaster "Head in the sand says the conflict denier.

lol'"


Dally's back icon_biggrin.gif didn't realise you knew so much about tights!!

RankPostsTeam
International Star188No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2011May 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Another one with the Dally thing... lol

Has nothing else clearly but to attack the man. Wrongly. Check with RB.

RankPostsTeam
International Star188No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2011May 2011LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Sal Paradise "Once again you have you head in the sand - TV companies buy sporting rights to sell subscriptions and advertising. 60% MARKET SHARE IN RL AREAS.

Just maybe the potential revenue streams that come from AFL coverage are better and have greater potential than that of RL. Rules is in every major city in Australia, RL is played in 3 - one of which is Melbourne. So as a TV company where are you likely to get new subscribers from in Adelaide, Perth a sport with no representation or a sport that has an established following? RULES ISN'T IN EVERY MAJOR CITY INCLUDING THE COUNTRY'S CAPITAL. RL AREAS HAVE 56% OR MORE OF THE POPULATION. 60% OF ADVERTISING SPEND.

It is not all about existing viewers? NO. I DIDN'T SAY IT WAS.'"


Unfortunately, as above, you fail on every count.

A rules follower in Leeds. icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach509No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Feb 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Sal Paradise "The FA Cup final is like the GF and it was on FTA - so as a % of the total population it is about 13%'"

You made the statement that Football in the U.K couldnt get above 3mill...How would an England - Scotland soccer game rate....prolly similar to the Origin percentages.

Quote: Sal Paradise "Of the 22m who live in Australia at the 2010 - 5.2m live in Victoria which AFL country, 2.1m in WA, 1.6m in SA - so in reality your 3.3m viewers comes from 6.9m in NSW and 4.2m in Queensland. i.e. 30%!'"

Or 2.2M (ish) combined...with a million from the other states...hardly unrealistic considering the massive amount of media and other coverage Origin and the NRL GF gets and, more importantly, in line with similar high profile sporting events in Australia and elsewhere...imho of course.

Quote: Sal Paradise "
You compare to La Liga'"

Nope, not me.

Quote: Sal Paradise "I suppose the point that is strange is this - given the interest in the game why do so few people attend games?'"

Because they are watching the telecast is the obvious answer icon_wink.gif...and the why isnt the topic of his thread.

For me (and considering the thread title) the important question would be: Why are the media companies allowed to underpay for Rugby League rights in Australia?

I believe WestCoaster, Eels Fan and dm may have a few ideas. icon_smile.gif

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman7155No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Sep 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: WestCoaster "I certainly take the continued abuse of the great game by News Limited personally and to be honest fail to see how any true rugby league fan, with the game's best interests at heart, could feel otherwise.

No offence to you personally.'"



So people who aren't as bothered by what you claim as "continued abuse" are not "true" rugby league fans with the game's best interest at heart?

Why should people be made to look "lesser" or "inferior" on the back of what is only your opinion?



This is all starting to sound a bit vichy.

1. Posts designed to try and wind someone else up will lead to a ban for a certain amount of days.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman7155No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Sep 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: joedynamo "For me (and considering the thread title) the important question would be: Why are the media companies allowed to underpay for Rugby League rights in Australia?

I believe WestCoaster, Eels Fan and dm may have a few ideas.

One can only think that the aforementioned media companies view it as a lesser product to invest in. Why? You tell me.

Everyone can have a few ideas, but not all are "true" fans apparently.




I can hear Gutterfax and his SADORLF line coming soon. icon_biggrin.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach18736No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2013Jan 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



The number of Brits living in Spain is falling but even those ex-pats that do still live here have little or no interest in Spanish football. If you visit the many British 'colonies' along the coast you'll see people reading British newspapers, reading about British football. It's the same with the television. Most ex-pats have Sky and are far more interested in Manchester United and Arsenal than Atlético Madrid or Real Madrid.
How many clubs are there in Sydney? There are only two cities in Spain with two top flight football teams. Those two cities happen to be the two biggest, Madrid (3,273,049 inhabitants) and Barcelona (1,621,537). Maybe there are too many teams in Sydney.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach509No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Feb 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: RB "Everyone can have a few ideas, but not all are "true" fans apparently.'"

Aye, but then you type wiv a landarrrn accent and are therefore worthy of suspicion eusa_think.gif icon_lol.gif

Not sure RL is viewed as a lesser 'product', if it was the SL War wouldnae happened and news wouldnt be fighting so hard to keep an influence within the sport...taken for granted maybe...hasnt Manly just started a thread about neins treatment of RL.

A constant theme since the Afl deal has been the NRL 'reminding' media companies that its not much good gaining subscribers in less populated markets if you're hemmoraging in the two biggest...

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2071No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2014Mar 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Rooster Booster "Why are we going to be screwed? And how? That perception would be based on whatever expectation you yourself had of our new deal wouldn't it?

Also Why did you never mention a conflict of interest in the past when you and Dally were going on about how we would get over $1b etc. etc. Is it because you saw what another sport got in their deal and now think we will get shafted? Did you believe that RL would get more than AFL? If so, why?




I think we'll be fine, we always will. In this country RL is very significant on any sporting radar. Even if we get less than AFL. So what, we'll still grow and teams will get a few more quid.'"



I have mentioned it here quite a few times, it seems that you are one of the few who can't and refuses to see the conflict.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2071No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2014Mar 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Rooster Booster "So people who aren't as bothered by what you claim as "continued abuse" are not "true" rugby league fans with the game's best interest at heart?

Why should people be made to look "lesser" or "inferior" on the back of what is only your opinion?

This is all starting to sound a bit vichy.

1. Posts designed to try and wind someone else up will lead to a ban for a certain amount of days.'"



Naaa, no one cares icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif


forums.leagueunlimited.com/showt ... p?t=365874

2,878 replies in this thread.

forums.leagueunlimited.com/showt ... p?t=352299

2,069 replies in this thread.



Read and educate yourself.

And vichy, lol, talk about scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

You sure you're a fan of RL?
Quote: Rooster Booster "So people who aren't as bothered by what you claim as "continued abuse" are not "true" rugby league fans with the game's best interest at heart?

Why should people be made to look "lesser" or "inferior" on the back of what is only your opinion?

This is all starting to sound a bit vichy.

1. Posts designed to try and wind someone else up will lead to a ban for a certain amount of days.'"



Naaa, no one cares icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif


forums.leagueunlimited.com/showt ... p?t=365874

2,878 replies in this thread.

forums.leagueunlimited.com/showt ... p?t=352299

2,069 replies in this thread.



Read and educate yourself.

And vichy, lol, talk about scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

You sure you're a fan of RL?


RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2071No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2014Mar 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Rooster Booster "One can only think that the aforementioned media companies view it as a lesser product to invest in. Why? You tell me.

Everyone can have a few ideas, but not all are "true" fans apparently.




I can hear Gutterfax and his SADORLF line coming soon.
Ummmm, because news owns half of the game, they own part of Foxsports along with Telstra, so when they go to buy the games, they are selling them to themselves.

They are profit driven, why would they pay as much as they should if they can get away with buying it off themselves cheaper?

Wouldn't that help them with their profits, the one and only thing they care about?

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman7155No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Sep 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: joedynamo "Aye, but then you type wiv a landarrrn accent and are therefore worthy of suspicion 9.255859375:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
47m
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
40791
Recent
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63259
Recent
Film game
Wanderer
5734
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
24s
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
35s
Rumours and signings v9
[Gareth]
28897
49s
Squad 2025
Miserybusine
64
58s
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
63259
1m
2025 Recruitment
Rattler13
204
2m
Accounts
Tony Fax
141
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2607
2m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
508
2m
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
MjM
21
2m
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Trojan Horse
36
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
52
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
FIL
50
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS