That's what I said so looks like your trolling too.

I've given you proof that the amendment to planning application is progressing which is key to any agreement to move as without it there's no way they could play there. Club have stated they are moving and the planning application is progressing, grateful to hear why you suggest otherwise and why I'd be party to such an agreement between Broncos and Wimbledon AFC? My opinion is that it's one hell of a gamble for the club.

You've posted no evidence whatsoever to back up why Danny Ward departure wasn't down to results. Given Danny Ward stated on Sky that it was agreed he was staying until the end of the year but was asked to leave after the Featherstone result. What leads you to state it wasn't down to results? Let me know what you have that differs from someone who was party to the conversation?

You stated Broncos bid was ignored, Leigh were announced as having the best application, London were refused not ignored unless of course you can prove otherwise.

And just to be clear, proof please not the owner of Wigan or Saints told you in a dream.

To orangeman

I don't revel in the misfortunes of London R.L but do question their approach to achieving stability as I feel you may well do yourself.

I read your post with interest & out of it I have 2 burning questions.

Given that London R.L has been offered & given as you say both intellectual & financial support by the RFL *something not offered to all R.L Clubs* & given as you say circa £30 Million *invested/gifted* + £20 Million of Sky/RFL money as you point out is not enough to sustain London as a Super League pro team or currently a top Championship team then .....

1. What is your current average attendance ? (As it directly affects sustainability)
1a. What is stopping it's growth ?

2. Is there value in London restarting as a Championship 1 Club &
2b would it be possible to become fan owned ? Would there be any desire in that or be financially viable, albeit starting at a lower level ?

So sneakily, 4 questions really.

Nor do I Ste, nor do I...............And exactly like you, I question their stability...................

Thats a long way of stating you having no evidence whatsoever to back up the move has stopped, Danny Ward was let go for non performance reason and the SL application was ignored.

Thank you.

1. I'm just an observer of a sad situation, I've followed London's journey since they were the main story on BBC news back in 1980 when they were Fulham. First game was a 9552 crowd against Wigan. Their hoisting to Superleague saw this crowd beaten when 9846 turned up for the visit of Brisbane Broncos. The club were on a high and fantastic to see. So was Branson leading the team out at Wembley in 1999.

It was David Lawrenson who wrote how Mr. Hughes and Tony Rea discussed the future of the club after Branson's pull out in a discussion that ended with an agreement that there was no point Mr. Hughes "Throwing good money after bad". The record is Mr. Hughes has thrown an enormous sum at London and we all may thank him for doing that. We all knew things were likely to come to an end and the 2014 1,000 crowd against Catalans in a season London could only beat a Leeds reserve team looked like the last. However time and again Hughes ponders his situation and time and again he comes back.

You have no "evidence" at all that London will go on forever, and no "evidence" that the move to Wimbledon will happen but if you follow the fans comments across the social media their feeling is that this is finally the end. It's a discussion point like it or not, and this is a discussion site like it or not........

2. Well what "evidence" do you have Ward was sacked for [i"Performance reasons"?[/i If you look at Mr. Ward's performance since he took over the coaching reigns it actually is very good indeed. He did a fantastic job with the youngsters and got the club promotion to Superleagye from a very competitive Championship, and he knocked over Toronto in their own back yard. London may have been relegated 2019 but they played their socks of and there was nothing between the bottom four clubs.

Ward is a great bloke and an excellent coach who has done a great job and London are fifth in the table. [i"performance reasons"[/i? Show me some real evidence

Quote: Donnyman " Seems no deal has gone through for moving in with Wimbledon, possibly after what fanbase is left mostly seemed to not be interested in yet another new dawn in another far away part of London. Top trolling. Oh, wait…. https://londonbroncosrl.com/2021/07/16/ ... -approved/

Quote: Donnyman " Seems no deal has gone through for moving in with Wimbledon, possibly after what fanbase is left mostly seemed to not be interested in yet another new dawn in another far away part of London. Top trolling. Oh, wait…. https://londonbroncosrl.com/2021/07/16/ ... -approved/

1. 250/300
1a. David Hughes ability to hire idiots combined with his amateur belief that people should be grateful that he pays for a team to play in their borough and should be lining up to attend games.
2. Depend on the finance behind any such entity as it would need Hughes Mark II But one with a concept of attracting fans = ticket revenue and also sponsors.
2b. Not a chance....the average age of our fanbase is 50+. Skolars will survive longer once London vanish