Like you say it does depend on what each team wants out of the game. In this, both teams probably wanted to just get some minutes into most of their squad. We've got another 2 friendlies, one against Newcastle, which will most likely be a reserve team, unless he feels one or two need more game time. Then we finish off against Hudds, which I imagine will be more like the starting 17 under an 8 man interchange.

It wasn't quite a full swap at HT but, having all of your squad getting a competitive run out can only be a good thing and Trinity's second team looked better than the FC reserves.

As for Boxing day, whatever the reason for Trinity taking 8 subs to Headingley, Chester certainly seemed surprised and disappointed and bearing in mind that it was a Christmas pudding game it seemed a little pedantic not to allow Jowitt and Batchelor some game time, mind you, both were outstanding yesterday so, maybe a blessing in disguise.

Hull KR 30-16 widnes

Only a friendly but feared the worst for us when i saw Kr's starting 13 and squad. We were missing Gelling, Inu, Ashall, Cahill, Gilmore and Craven but used 17 players yesterday who have come through the ranks at Widnes, great effort all round by the lads.

indeed it was, and i think they will go well in the championship next year very organised and robust,

Salford 52-6 Swinton

Comfortable win for Salford and a few new faces given a run-out in our first (of only 2) pre-season friendly.

Starting XIII
Evalds
Chamberlain
Sa'u
Welham
Bibby
Luis
Hastings
Dudson
Lussick
Mossop
Jones
Turgut
Flanagan

Interchange: Griffin, McCarthy, Nakubuwai, Johnson, Olpherts, Davies-Aspey, Wellington

Props and wingers did 40 minutes each and our main men (Lui, Hastings, Sa'u) etc came off after 55-60 minutes. Steady performance with some pretty slick handling at times against an admittedly limited Swinton outfit. Don't think we learnt anything new from what we know already in that our first 17 looks pretty strong but we'll rely heavily on our spine which is up there (IMO) with some of the best in the division. And we obviously won't be able to cope with a big injury list with such a small squad. Whether we have the firepower up front to lay the platform for Lui & Jacko to run amok remains to be seen. Kopczak will be a big loss and some of the younger lads will need to step up. We could also do with a bit more pace in the backline as we're lacking a but in that dept.

Sio, Lawton, Wood, Tomkins and Murray to come into the squad still and Adam Walker in March will beef things up a little. In theory a lighter pack capable of playing big minutes should benefit us with the rule changes but I guess time will tell. Wigan up next and I'd imagine they'll play a strong team prior to their SL opener with Saints the following week.

One big plus was a debut for 16yo hooker Connor Davies-Aspey, a product of our foundation. The kid looks about 12 and took a couple of big hits but made a few cracking breaks and his distribution was excellent. We don't get to see many youth products breaking through at Salford so hopefully the kid has a big future in front of him if managed properly.

Why should we have won by 79 points like in a real game

I’m gutted snd I doubt Chester can sleep at night

Don’t bother he’s fishing.

Why, it’s a friendly who cares about the result it’s a glorified training session or at least that what Leeds fans say about the Boxing Day game.

If you knew owt about the game you’d know that all the coach wants is to give every player some match fitness nothing more.

Next thing you’ll be telling us Leeds beating donny is a sign of intent. You really are silly at times.

Who said anything about the result? Nobody, so you’re whinging about something nobody said.

It was a discussion about match fitness and how many subs to use, given the reduction in interchanges this year then it’s a genuine question whether teams should be looking at playing starters a bit longer than just 1 half of rugby in the warm ups.

Well you did actually. You said Radford would be happier. Seeing as Trinity won by two tries then clearly the only thing that could make Chester less happy than Radford is that we didn’t win by enough. It’s you whose attempted to change tack since then not us.

So If this is not the case please explain what you meant in your opening post - I ask you straight out, why would Radford the coach of the losing team be happier. Remember these are your words not mine.

Never mentioned Radford, said Hull fans, learn to read.

And saying the losing team would be happier only proves that I don’t deem the result important. Completely opposite to what you’re trying to claim and nothing to do with the post I made about playing more friendlies which is the one you went off on one about it.

Basically what’s happened is that you’ve seen me say a team who played Wakefield will be the happier and just seen red and soiled yourself and gone off on one.

I love how you question Trinity's warm up schedule and pontificate about how many players they should use ??
Surely Chester and his staff have worked out what they want from each of their players and the side as a whole in preparation for the forthcoming season ?? and the fact that YOU think they may not be doing the right thing is quite incredible

If you pm me your contact details, I will personally ensure that they are passed on to Mr Chester and I'm sure that he will be grateful