|
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Expansion. Vs consolidation thread |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 7194 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2019 | Jul 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Joff "Yesterday has debunked the following myths
Firstly your missing post is on the viva la Catalans thread secondly I don’t think anyone has said expansion has failed in France on the contrary I think we’re ready for another French team in SL and I’ve heard the call for Manchester rangers for a while now but are they ready or even want to be in L1 yet ( what happened to the Oxford/ Gloucester merger) and finally calling everyone who supports a heartlands club an anti expansionist flatcapper doesn’t really help
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Psychedelic Casual "Areas of the country with no top Premier League side or top RU side:
Southport
Grimsby
Lincoln
Stoke
Chester
Sunderland
Plymouth
Shrewsbury
Blackpool
York
Peterborough
Southend-on-sea
Portsmouth
Derby
Preston
Lancaster
Middlesbrough
Bradford
Aldershot and Farnborough
Barnsley
Luton
Milton Keynes
Crawley
Mansfield
Swindon
Peterborough'" )
Many of those places are football towns through and through. I was an advocate of Milton Keynes about 15 years ago but that opportunity has gone, with the MK Dons now established.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| London may not have succeeded too well club wise but has produced quite a few SL players. It has expanded the player pool.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 272 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Apr 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
Absolutely correct
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1345 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Dec 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
Top post, absolutely correct
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Sep 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
But by that logic then there should never be expansion because it is a great fear to take any risks?
You are forgetting that the great pioneers who started off this great game took a huge risk when they broke away from the establishment.
Any success is often built on a series of failure, but the success comes from the determination to keep trying!
Yes, there hace been many failed clubs, but look at the pattern. Those failed clubs were often rushed attempts.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2921 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2017 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: spegs "Invest the misappropriated funding in the grass roots and build from there.'"
who exactly has misappropriated funds? London, PSG and Crusaders received less than £30,000,000 collectively over 20 years......so who has been short changed? The likes of Wakefield are the real waste of cash.......£1.8 million a year spent avoiding relegation........major franchises and identifiable cities,,,,,not the likes of Salford or Widnes.....
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 272 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Apr 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The rugby league public care for clubs with history and tradition, not major 'super clubs' or 'major franchises'
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2921 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2017 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: EastHullUTR "The rugby league public care for clubs with history and tradition, not major 'super clubs' or 'major franchises''"
The rugby league public voted leave and are ageing and becoming extinct faster than the T rex......if we don't evolve, we will die!
Richmond......London Scottish.....these were major union clubs up to the 90's.........the rfu stepped over their corpses on the way to being strong comp......we should do the same with the likes of Wakefield and not shed a tear in doing so.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 272 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Apr 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Call Me God "The rugby league public voted leave and are ageing and becoming extinct faster than the T rex......if we don't evolve, we will die!
Richmond......London Scottish.....these were major union clubs up to the 90's.........the rfu stepped over their corpses on the way to being strong comp......we should do the same with the likes of Wakefield and not shed a tear in doing so.'"
Making the argument about age or political leaning really isn't going to strengthen your point. No one up north cares about Rugby Union no one down south cares about Rugby League
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2921 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2017 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: EastHullUTR "Making the argument about age or political leaning really isn't going to strengthen your point. No one up north cares about Rugby Union no one down south cares about Rugby League'"
Really.....you have stats to prove this do you? Guess what...I have loads of stats that prove you're wrong, but carry on with your opinion......
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2018 | Sep 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: EastHullUTR "Making the argument about age or political leaning really isn't going to strengthen your point. No one up north cares about Rugby Union no one down south cares about Rugby League'"
Then your foolish ignorance is the problem.
It will always come back to the same choice: expand or die.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 2448 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Sep 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Cronus "My concerns around expansion are that we're risking destroying clubs and their long standing fan base, community heritage and family tradition, and weakening UK RL overall, for expansion clubs which have mostly been proven to fail.
Once those clubs and that tradition is gone, it's gone. If a team goes to the wall, it's all lost forever. If we throw (for example) Widnes, Wakey, Salford and Hudds out for expansion sides, our already weakened UK RL community becomes weaker as fans and tradition drift away. That affects TV audiences, sponsorship revenues, amateur playing numbers, online engagement and revenue, and more.
The elephant in the room is that if we fill SL with expansion and international teams, RL in the UK will shrink, not grow, and that is a disaster.
So what exactly is the goal with 'expansion'? If we end up with Catalans, Toulouse, Toronto, New York, Barcelona and whoever else in SL...what is the goal? Because it seems to me you're replacing medium sized UK clubs for medium sized expansion clubs. You're simply displacing the fan base for a club that - as we've seen over and over - could vanish in a heartbeat.
Is the goal a disjointed and contrived 'international' Super League? Or is it to establish competitions in France, North America and wherever else and eventually those teams rejoin their national leagues? Because either way, RL in the UK will be smaller and weaker. And that's before even talking about what a decreasing audience and interest does to sponsorship, advertising and TV revenues.
Furthermore, half your home games with zero visiting fans and a quiet, dull atmosphere, and being unable to attend half your away games due to cost and distance is NOT driving the game forward from a fan's perspective - and we seem to be forgetting the game exists for the fans.
I'm all for expansion, but not at the cost of killing off existing clubs. A strong UK Super League with strong French and North American leagues should be the goal, with a Champions League-type competition to garner international interest.'"
Print this off, drive to SL HQ and, like Martin Luther, nail this on Elstone’s office door.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2921 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2017 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: mapleyther "Print this off, drive to SL HQ and, like Martin Luther, nail this on Elstone’s office door.'"
only as a blueprint of what not to do....if you can't fill a 10,000 seat stadium then you really shouldn't be getting close to £2,000,000 in handouts each year.......RL fans.......and make no mistake, there are maybe 70,0000 of them left, are getting older and more selective as to where they spend their pensions....so it is time to forget pandering to them and to start finding a new audience.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
2.869140625:10
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.65M | 1,718 ↓-41 | 80,156 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
29 |
768 |
338 |
430 |
48 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Hull KR |
29 |
731 |
344 |
387 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
29 |
580 |
442 |
138 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
27 |
1032 |
275 |
757 |
52 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
26 |
765 |
388 |
377 |
37 |
Bradford |
28 |
723 |
420 |
303 |
36 |
York |
29 |
695 |
501 |
194 |
32 |
Widnes |
27 |
561 |
502 |
59 |
29 |
Featherstone |
27 |
634 |
525 |
109 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Swinton |
28 |
484 |
676 |
-192 |
20 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
Hunslet |
1 |
6 |
10 |
-4 |
0 |
|