This sounds ok, as long as it is executed properly and transparently. Means it doesn't even have to be 20. Can be 14-15 or whatever number, and increase over time if need be.

The top 6 in the championship all need to make clear what their plans are for being a full time club, with teams across all grades. And if the plans are realistic, then let them in.

Everybody talk about....

10 teams is too few. 6 team playoff from 10 is a joke.

Another structure change, joy

Is this actually happening though?

Pop music...........Dooby dooby do wop..........Wop wop do wop

Of course its happening. Are you blind man!

This x100000000.


I don't see why the sport is so against going back to structures that worked in the past. 12 or 14 teams. 1 up, 1 down, 5 team play-offs. Bring the CC games earlier in the season so people more likely to go. Simples.

The damage is already done. Time for change again and stick with it.

Correct.

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... 8s-1667763 This seems to suggest no super 8s I hope we don't go back to rewarding mediocrity and have a top 8 playoff

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... 8s-1667763 This seems to suggest no super 8s I hope we don't go back to rewarding mediocrity and have a top 8 playoff

We're Doooooooooooooooooooooooooooomed.

They might do,seeing that you won't get there on merit.

I'm all for expansion and growing the game. But no one would watch a sport were the positions are fixed. Get there on merit or not at all.

Toronto are doing fine with the current formula.

Back on topic, this does seem like rearranging deck chairs. If they want to grow the game then clubs need to market themselves. You don't hear rugby union teams saying moving the format will grow the game. They are pro active and sell their own clubs.

Again this seems like the chairmen are looking for a format to sell the game rathet than just selling the game themselves.