Give them a change. This news has only just broke,

League Express gave it 13 lines before giving six paragraphs to the story about him donating his programme collection to the University of Huddersfield.

Does that look like proper scrutiny to you?

I took Martyn Sadler to task (along with a few others) on twitter. He's replied saying that RFL officials don't answer the questions you want and that fans should petition for sports bodies to be subject to FOI if we want investigative journalism.

Seems like he's not bothered. If I remember correctly investigative journalism has been around a lot longer than FOI.

As for Danny Lockwood in League Weekly he's on some rant about glamour girls in darts in his editorial which is bafflingly irrelevant to anyone but him by the looks of it.

I don't think anyone in the world is worth, or needs, a salary of £314k. I don't particularly like Wood, but that's probably down to his physical appearance than performance. It is difficult to comment on his success, or lack of it, as I do not know what his performance indicators & job description were. But if he had a contract which has been terminated then it is not unusual to get a pay off. Usually a year or 2 year's salary. I wonder how many of those objecting to Wood's salary because he is fat also object to also take the time to object to inflated salaries of bankers, hedge fund managers, CEOs of failing companies who are really screwing the country.

Isn't £314k the weekly take home pay of Alexis Sanchez ?

Where else do you expect the airline to fit him in, apart from luggage?

i've sent a tweet to the RFL making this very point. Think we ought to send a few more their way

Luv it.

I can't for the life of see how he can get that amount as he resigned

Thats what happens at the top of business. You agree a package, then resign to make it look amicable.

This isn't a clerk resigning to join another company for a few extra hundred quid.

Unfortunately true; someone approaches him and says "It's not working any more Nige - we need you to go..." and from there, a negotiation towards a settlement agreement happens. It's then publicised as being his decision - and the confidentiality of that will be written in for both sides - hence the RFL not talking to journos about the detail.

Personally, I think on many occasions people end up walking away with a generous pay-off, when a bit more intestinal fortitude from the organisation would see them gone for a lot less - but we're all fearful of a protracted and expensive employment tribunal. That can be avoided by better governance - if the senior exec has a clear set of KPI's and the process of achieving them, or not, is properly managed, it's easier to get rid of them for free if they haven't delivered. I can't see any metric by which Nige has delivered 300k worth of value to RL year on year, but if no one has agreed with him what that looks like, it's hard to formally prove that he hasn't.

Bigger picture, they are crazy sums of money for a sport that scratches around for cash; the RFL needs a complete shake-up - 300k would get you a serious operator who could deliver that - but we're very parochial at that level, hence the committee mans meteoric rise to fat cat status.

The only people who can really do anything about this are the SL chairmen, and they don't seem to care.

the only thing 'marquee' about big Nige was the size of his jacket..which doubled as a marquee.

I'm puzzled. If the RFL wont answer Martyn Sadlers questions why did they tell anyone about the payoff? Surely they realised that this would lead to questioning and more unease about the way the game is being run.

I might be outdated but how someone can walk through the centre of any northern town look in a few door holes & gratefully accept £500k without dying of shame is beyond me.

The cockpit maybe? But then the plane would either fail to take off or it would immediately nose dive.