There will be one or two fools who argue something like that but most Leeds fans will have no complaints. I just had a quick look on the RFL site. He's not been charged with anything in the last 6 years at least so that should stand in his favour and rightly so. Never the less it was a clear headbutt which is viewed quite seriously. EGP and 2 matches IMO.

30 seconds from the end, Cas knock on recovered by an offside Cas player in front of him. Why was that given as a scrum and not a penalty?

Personally I thought he was going for a head to head rather than throwing a head butt In. Will have to look at it again

I bet my house he'll be playing in cup game. 2-3 games max because its Sinfield.

will await the first leeds poster to defend sinfield!

regardless of past history, he should be banned, peacock too for twisting clarkes ankle, pellisier (sp) did something similar to hereamaia last season intending to cause injury and got banned

Tonights over-reaction theatre.

Sinfield was silly, he wasnt a full on head butt, more a head push but you still cant do that, he will get a few games.

Peacock did nothing other than tackle a player and hold on to him, whats he supposed to do let an untackled player go? That one is laughable.

Really good game, too good teams playing good RL. Probably the best quality game ive seen this season.

Typical of RLfans that we will be seeing a conversation about a stupid bit of nonsense and the referee rather than the brilliant game we have just seen.

Disgraceful language and head butt from Sinfield.

That was ridiculous! Great game, terribly unlucky not to take the 2 points on offer and I thought Dorn was MOTM.

To be honest I do expect it from him. In the last season or two he has go progressively worse. Always seems to get away with it though.

Jamie Peacock trying to end Clark's career - clear penalty, kick you'd expect Sneyd not to miss
Peacock + the other marker stood next to each other - clear penalty pretty much under the sticks

Neither given, both happened before that and would have meant what you saw never happened if Thaler actually had the bottle to give clear penalties to give Cas the game.

Because the ref was biased in favour of leeds. He thought leeds would score a last second super try so didnt want to waste the glory on two point win. All refs are biased against some teams and in favour of others. Oddly it often seems to coincide with who the person stating the refs bias wanted to score.

I'm really shocked and disgusted at what happened. Leeds fans, and I know some fans of other teams, look up to Sinfield as not only a great player but a great guy outside of the game.

This is so unlike him, I assumed Dorn must have said something to Sinfield that we didn't see, but I can't see much evidence of that on replays. If this was someone like Tomkins or Bailey, there'd be calls for bans to end his season. Sinfield's clean disciplinary record will work to his advantage but he will rightly deserve a ban. As a Leeds fan I just hope it will end in time for the Challenge Cup Semi-Final! Though couldn't complain if it didn't.

Classy!!

I don't like Leeds and I don't particularly like Sinfield, but theres a bit of over reacting going on for me here. Stupid petulant play that has cost his team a point. Not a proper headbutt, 1-2 matches is all it deserves, but I think he'll get SOS if he makes an early guilty plea.

He can't get an EGP if they go by their own guidelines. Grade B is 'light contact', C is 'full contact' and E-F (Which are not eligible for EGP) is 'full contact in an aggressive violent manner'. It would take some serious lying to suggest that he wasn't being aggressive and the contact wasn't violent there.

I think they'll probably go for a grade C and hope no one pulls them up on their incompetency.