So did I. he's gone right up in my estimations now.

Next week they'll interview Barnes and Inverdale and then that ghastly witch nose monster Gaby whatever her name is now woman will do the interviewing.
Big gob Stevo and Hock will be championing RL at the same time.

Yeah, but nobody will really care because their sport is a 19th century relic. They can plough as much money into development as they like but RU is a failure by design.

The entertainment for the RLWC final tomorrow will outstrip the entire entertainment for the RUWC in 2015.

They can keep there money, and I'll keep my RL.

Not being sure of who will win and knowing upsets are very possible will make it entertaining.

You mean upsets like these?

New Zealand 83-7 Japan
New Zealand 79-15 Canada
England 67-3 Romania
Ireland 62-12 Russia
Australia 68-22 Russia
South Africa 87-0 Namibia
Wales 81-7 Namibia
Wales 66-0 Fiji

The RUWC is a really poor competition, honestly. RLWC by plenty.

FlexWheeler↓
Re
The takings for the RUWC final in 2015 will outstrip the entire takings for the RLWC.
It will also have more knock ons, more forward passes, more goal kicks, longer scrims, to name a few other things it will have more of. Its for sure it won't have as much of and that's running passing skills and most importantly entertainment value.

3 different teams have won in the last 3 tournaments.

Total attendance for the last RUWC: 1,477,294 Mind blowing figure that.

In 2007 it was 2,263,223 with a cumulutive world tv audience of 4.2 billion!

England, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand.

Sum total of winners in the Rah Rah's entire history of its world cup, with far more teams

RUWC 2015 winners will come from New Zealand, Australia or South Africa.

Hmmmm, three teams have a chance of winning. Bigger sport than us, you would expect others could win.

Union, the sport, has nothing to apologize for. Generations of media bigots do.

I suspect you know little of which you speak.