If we have a cow, we can swap it for some magical SL Club beans, then smokey and Headhunter can along with big Nige plant them where they want their new mega clubs


Derrrrrr

That's the idea of Tragic Weekend. We take a load of SL fixtures to a different big city each season and they all fall in love with the greatest game by wanting their very own SL club. The stadiums are already in place. Have you not noticed the Tragic Weekend working it's Magic?

And the system we have now didn't artificially promote Celtic and Kill them off? Think they faired better than Featherstone would?

Clueless Pratt

No, no, no, no, NO freddie, the Celtic Crusaders won promotion fair and square, how they managed to run a full time squad of players all with company cars ( all included in salary cap ) but most without a legal Visa all on paying attendances similar to Swinton, with a 150K salary cap ,playing out of SL standard Brewery Field has never been explained

I don't see what relevance this has to anything, but both on and off the field Celtic performed about as well in their first year as Featherstone probably would, and in their second year considerably better. They also finished 2nd in the Championship in their promotion season and lost the Championship GF in extra time, so would have gone up under any system as the league was expanding to 14 teams. For the poster above, they also had a higher average attendance than Leigh in their one Championship season. They failed because the owner was a crook, not that any of this is relevant to anything in this thread so I'm not sure why you felt the need to bring it up.

There aren't any, that's why the proposed new system is nonsense. Replacing clubs that struggle to compete with even weaker clubs with less potential isn't progress. I don't support any of the 'top clubs' so I'm not sure what you are talking about in regards to that, but surely you can understand that having uncompetitive clubs in Super League isn't a good thing. And yes, there are two uncompetitive clubs at the moment. One will be competitive next year (Salford), and the other probably won't exist (London). Regardless, Super League is being reduced to 12 teams and we probably have 12 or 13 competitive clubs ATM, so the idea of relegating one of those clubs and replacing them with an uncompetitive club is totally illogical. If you seriously think that Featherstone can be competitive without reducing the standards of the league then good luck to you, and I hope you're right. What I don't want to see is standards at the top being reduced so that clubs such as Featherstone are able to compete, which is what some people on this forum seem to be advocating.
Like I said, if you honestly believe that Featherstone and similar clubs can compete without standards in Super League being reduced to allow it, then good luck to you. I think you're in for a rude awakening though. Surely you can agree though that limiting the standard of Super League and holding back development to allow the likes of Featherstone to compete would be a bad thing?

I applaud all the work being done at Fev, but would add a slight word of caution.

Your owner has mentioned that he would be happy to place a 7 figure sum in escrow as some form of assurance if Fev were to step up to replace London in 2014.......the problem is, in late 2012 the owner of Bradford said something along the lines of he'd look to invest 2 million over a number of years but has in fact already shipped 1.74 million inside 12 months.
Bradford are averaging 8,800 or so this year yet have needed 1.74 million in "assistance" from their owner and a 200k loan from the council just to pay their wages. Fev would look to average maybe 3k less than Bradford.....the 7 figure guarantee wouldn't go very far and if you were getting spanked every week, neither would the fans. Better to let London stumble through 2014 and then test your "progress" in 2015 with the middle 8 scenario.

For Headhunter I said PAYING attendances, I attended Leighs matches at Brewery field, they had 2 local union matches on before them, let 2 coachloads of German tourists in, had several hundred armed service personell all let in free and the local youths were climbing over the fenes to enter

So explain the full time squad on 150 K?

It was the most poorly organised club I have ever visited, the stewards were telling me the attendance at the leigh game was the biggest by far they had had that year, we stayed over and on both nights around.Bridgend nobody even knew there was a RL team playing at Brewery Field, and this was 400 yards from the stadium

It was a complete farce

So where are these clubs with ' Potential ' ?

Spot on, but if they want to risk it, it is up to them, as you pointed out on another thread a couple of weeks ago, this new structure does give clubs a remit to build themselves in financial terms with regards income streams, and not all clubs will skin the cat the same way

Dont forget the Championship Clubs by their very nature are probably better organised than some SL clubs because they have had to be to survive

Headhunter, they clearly weren't a well run club, especially after the RFL got involved.

All those people you disingenuously called flat cappers so it coming! Most if those flat cappers wanted licensing to work fairly and saw this coming - Celtic were the thin end if the wedge.

Parachuting a club into SL when unprepared doesn't work, you are correct, so why the hell bang on about creating new "franchises"?

Surely the answer is to invest in and improve what we have instead of strangling them? Give a sporting goal to aim to raise enthusiasm at a club?

Just keep digging from here

Again Headhunter, where are the other options?

Fev are building a stronger club, that should be applauded and encouraged, they are already probably a better run club than some in SL, because they have to be

Headhunter. Which club do you go and watch, week in week out? Are you embarrassed to say that you don't actually watch live games and aren't a fan? Don't be, we're all friends on here.

They clearly weren't a well run club, they were terribly run which is why they failed, although to be fair at the time I don't remember anyone questioning the running of the club, just the fact that they were 'Welsh'. I'm also pretty sure I've never personally called anyone a 'flat capper'. Again I'm not sure what this has to do with this debate. I haven't ever once talked about 'creating new franchises' so I'm not sure what you are talking about there, what I'm opposed to is a system that sees Super League limiting itself and holding itself back so that clubs with little potential can compete. The system of P&R that you seemingly advocate is designed for exactly what you're just talked about, parachuting unprepared clubs into Super League at short notice.

And Starbug, I've already answered your question. Super League should be comprised of the strongest 12 (or 14) teams. If Featherstone or any other clubs are part of that then they should be in, that's what the licensing system is. The problem comes when, in order to allow the likes of Featherstone to be included, people want to implement a system that means Super League is not necessarily made up of the strongest 12 teams. If Featherstone need to rely on an on-field lottery as the only means of winning promotion, are they really one of the strongest 12 clubs? Changing the system seems be an admission that they aren't, and what I can't understand is what is so special about clubs like Featherstone that the rest need to be held back for their sake.

Looks like he's ignoring said question ... again!

You obviously didnt read my posts on the subject at the time then , I was clear without any anti Welsh or new club content, and unfortunatly the RFL started licencing in such a blatantly biased way it was doomed to fail, and it has failed only 1 or 2 clubs are actually operating susstainably, the rest are completely ' unprepared ' as it is