Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "You are talking rubbish. You do not know better than the professional referees concerned. They were right. You are wrong. You can argue that the law [ishould[/i be changed to apply to that situation, but as it stands, it does not.
In any case, using your own logic, "offence against try scorer" simply does not apply. If you speak English and are not mad, then answer me this
Ok, you need to calm down a bit. Take a deep breath and try not to get so upset as we're only having a discussion.
First of all, professional referees make mistakes just like anyone else, so unless you are suggesting that they are always 100% correct and no discussion should ever take place about refereeing decisions then your first comment is rather silly. And my argument isn't that the law should be changed; quite the opposite, those who claim that the law should only apply once the ball is grounded should argue that the law should be changed to "grounded". I am going off the law as it stands in its current form. If you recall, the commentators and pundits were also bemused by the non-implementation of the law in this particular try scoring situation.
Second, Tomkins was the try scorer and an offence was committed against him. This is beyond contention. And you're actually wrong, it does state that the law applies to a try scorer or someone who will shortly score a try but has not done so yet. It does so by specifically (and surely, we can assume, purposefully) using the word "GROUNDING" instead of "GROUNDED".
Third, you are desperately splitting hairs regarding the moment of impact. I'm sure you could make a screen grab 1 or 2 frames either side of the one I took, which would make the impact occur between 0.32 and 0.16 seconds before the ball is grounded, as opposed to the 0.24 seconds I quoted. The distinction makes no difference to the spirit of the law which is intended to address offences against try scorers as opposed to, you know, offences committed during ordinary play when a try is not scored.