well according to league weekly hull won't be further punished by the rfl, but not for the reasons discussed on here in the main. seems that the rfl do not impose further punishments in this area and leave it up to uk anti doping to impose the sanctions. as i mentioned earlier and as in the majority of drugs in sport cases it is the individuals involved who are punished

however this is league weekly we are talking about so may not be 100% accurate

Wonder what they would have done if Rule had still been in charge? Classic RFL brush under the carpet response.

My thoughts exactly - the RFL has let UKAD do the dirty work and despite stating in the public domain last week that Hull FC had brought the game into disrepute, appear to have chosen to do nothing about it; surely that sends out completely the wrong message to everyone within and without the game?

[sizeWRONG[/size

[iChief executive Nigel Wood said

Now where does he say that Hull FC have brought the game into disrepute?

If you're gonna have a go a trolling, try learning from a master, there are a number of them on here

Well he isn't in charge any more, he "resigned" on the day he knew he would definitely be charged.

So you can put the crusty sock back in the drawer

You're arguing semantics; if this case has brought the sport into disrepute, it follows that Hull FC are responsible for that, since they are vicariously liable for the actions of their employees.

It's a pointless debate however, since the RFL appear to have opted to take the path of least resistance.

I'm not arguing semantics fool, I'm stating that your assertion was wrong, which it very definitely was. It could also be construed as borderline libelous.

Three ex-employees of Hull FC have been found liable, not the club, nor any other employees.

Now much as it may pain you, accept the fact that any and all sanctions have been delivered and get on with your twisted, little life.

Semantics and ad-hominem, in the space of two posts; you're my hero.

RFLP in no balls shocker!

And I aint getting on no plane!

Give it up, coddy. He knows all there is to know about vicarious liability and that's all there is to it.

You seem obsessed with this. Are you still angry that we binned agar and he ended up in wakefield?

1. HullFC brought the game into disrepute as it was HULLFC's stupid centre, who took banned substances gained from HULLFC's stupid Captain, passed by HULLFC's stupid conditioner and it was covered up by HULLFC's CEO.
At no other time in the last week has any other club BUT HULLFC had any involvement in this and as such it was their name and kit all over every channel and all the national press!!!

2. Of Course FC should be punished, he was clearly using this during his time on the field for FC and as such since certain club figure heads new it then the whole club was cheating!!!!

Awww bless

Back to school soon eh?