So in example Salford over spend by £2m and win everything then the following year get a 2 point deduction differed, sound reasonable to me

Tried reading it three times.
Anyone??

Think he's trying to be hypothetical. But it's a head scratcher.

Should be called
Wigan we can do what the

I do not think that Wigan breaking the salary cap in the near is very likely. This is because Ian Lenegans pockets are no longer deep enough to pay the full cap.

Fans of all the other mid table teams will be in arms now as those 2 points could be the difference in missing the play offs

Should be called
Wigan we can do what the

Didnt work the first time d**b a*s

I would agree with that were it an administrative error in this case. It wasn’t, however much Lenagan might try and say it was. The rules are simple, easily available and when it was pointed out to them they disputed it should count on the cap. That’s not an administrative error. That’s trying to get away with going over the cap. Which they’ve now done thanks to Lenagan’s new bestie.

Salary Cap Stuff like this should be "cast in stone" to stop appeals, something on the lines of with no excuses accepted:

1 to 10,000 .................caution.
10,000 to 20,000.........2 points
21,000 to 50,000 .......4 points
51,000 + ..................6 points and fine equivalent.

That's my reading of it too - their first response was to defend their actions and claim that it's a stupid rule anyway; which indicates that this wasn't some Excel slip-up by the Accounts Apprentice, but a deliberate act.

It does rather make a mockery of the rules, which will bite them when the next breach happens: "It was an admin error and we don't agree with the rule anyway, give us our points back," will now be the standard defence.

The cranks are back long live RL Fans we are wigan and can do what we like

got to love the anti Wigan brigade haven't you pal