What is [i'something completely different' [/i supposed to mean?





Not that I actually asked you to answer that post.

He didn't

That's not what it says, is it.

They were found guilty of employing these players without the proper paperwork. Ignorance is not a defence.

no, they werent, they were working with the incorrect work permits. This however doesnt make them illegal immigrants. They were legally in this country.



Im sure you will. But you do like making things up so its no surprise

im still unclear how two people who pretend to be RL fans can take so much pleasure in death riding an RL club to the point where everything needs to be pejorative and even to the level of simply making things up.

Its sad

Erm, no they werent. And i would be careful of accusing someone of a criminal offence they havent been proved guilty of.

They were found guilty of nothing, yet. The players were found guilty of not having the correct paperwork.

The Club are now subject to a civil penalty notice for not making the correct checks, with gives them the opportunity to show they did make the correct checks.

It means it is something different, i.e not the same

It means the issues you brought in werent relevant to the point made.

Not pleasure at all , however just pretending something didn't happen doesn't mean it didn't , but if enough people pretend it didn't happen , nobody will learn from it and they will make the same mistakes again , and again , and again

What is sad is how people like yourself are willing to act stupid to protect the people supposed to be running our sport

Or maybe your paranoia is just that. Maybe ignoring the facts and what we know to be true isnt the best way to come to the right outcome like you are!

You have basically admitted you are ignoring what we know to be true because it doesnt fit your image of the RFL and club, and its sad.

It would seem you are outvoted , he asked questions of tb's post that correctly challenged it , you havent answered them , neither has tb we notice , Just as he hasn't answered mine

What is sad is that Crusaders were given a much coveted,some may say ill deserved, 3 year SL licence and failed miserably just one third of the way through it.Thats the sad thing.

No, you were prevaricating again.

You couldn’t give a simple yes or no, because that would prove my point, so you try something cryptic that could mean anything.

Pathetic, just pathetic.

You dont know the truth any more than anybody else , just as you didn't know anything about the Celtic Crusaders except what you had read on here and in the press , none of what you thought you knew about them was from any kind of personal experience , open your eyes

You are assuming that the RFL dont tell lies

No No No No No , you dont understand . , it was just all a mistake , it was all planned that way from the start , it's just when the licence announcements were made somebody lost a full page of the press release , on it it stated that after one season they would re locate to north Wales .

It was all just a clerical error

Because they are quite clearly irrelevant,

the double standard highlighted by TB isnt answered by a completely different comparison.