Quote Chris Dalton="Chris Dalton"You were calling people scum the very last page. I don't think I need to trawl 108 pages to see you attacking someone either. It's not doing anyone any favours.'"
I did not call anybody scum. It is unfortunate that you have not called the person I was
responding to for what he said,
Quote Chris Dalton but some of the more delusional Bradford posters on here deserve the ridiculing they are getting '"
Trying to work out why you have singled me out for public rebuke, I am struggling. My post was:-
Quote Chris DaltonEr, Durham Giant is not a Bradford poster. But it is true that Bradford fans' misfortune is certainly flushing the scum up out of the toilet sewers, that's for sure. '"
This was both a direct reference to the posts put up by DG, which are very strange, and especially unfortunate given he is a Mod; plus a general comment which I consider is very fair comment, especially on the RAB forum where some quite vile things have been said. Indeed, it is on much the same lines as a post by another Mod, this time one from RAB:
Quote Chris Dalton="Pumpetypump"I have to say, as melodramatic as this may sound, if you do 'enjoy' what is happening to Bradford you really are a bit of filth. '"
"Filth", "scum", all much of a muchness, but like me, he did NOT CALL ANY INDIVIDUAL "filth". I think his comment is very fairly said, and just as fair as mine, but as you publicly chide me, why haven't you done the same with him?
I don't claim to be a paragon of virtue but seem to be the first person who has been now singled out, when I would think I am one of the people trying to and mostly succeeding to sticking to topic.
And yes, with the greatest of respect you WILL have to trawl a lot more than 108 pages to see me attacking anyone. You will find that I only
respond to attacks. I don't gratuitously make them. Typically I will make some comments about the situation at the Bulls, or answer some questions or address some issues, and then some wonderfully nice saintly individual will frequently come on and say nothing whatsoever in response, but just have a pop, attempt to take the pis, or otherwise flame.
Is it your view that if someone comes on here and has a right go at me, and the post is allowed to stay up, that I nevertheless can't respond? I'm sorry but either the attack goes, or I have a right of reply, as long as my reply does not breach AUP which I'm sure they do not.
I haven't even participated in the thread that much, and the first time I called someone an idiot was when one "Durham Giant", who like your good self is allegedly a Moderator somewhere, posted a purely gratuitous attack on me by name, thus:
Quote Chris Dalton="Durham Giant"I await with baited breath FA's suggestion and legal arguement on why the RFL have behaved illegally '"
... and that was on page 96. I had not said a word about anyone acting illegally, least of all the RFL. Nobody pulled him up on that.
I then retorted in kind to FlexWheeler when that person instead of posting anything on topic, posted that I was:
Quote Chris DaltonStill blaming anyone other than those responsible I see........'"
... when I had not been doing any such thing. It was, of course, just done gratuitously and in an attempt to provoke, and so I think i was fair in putting him in his place in my defence.
And that's it. So why have a go at me? I don't get it. Next time perhaps you should think again about those 108 pages before you have a go at me for things which I haven't done.