seriously jokes aside the number of english fans that know little about their own game is disappointing. i wish there were more people over there as interested in league as me.

its too few.

ive read the RFL has sole discretion over the number of teams in the league so what SL chairman want is irrelevant

Don't ruin another thread please.

You've already been told you're wrong. You haven't provided anything to backup what you've read (i.e. where you actually read it, whether it is a credible source, etc.) so you're basically contradicting your point on "going off internet rumour".

Just let it go and join in the discussion instead of drifting it away.

i read it on another RL forum where it was discussed.

little tip, if you dont want to reply, dont.

i dont bother myself with hours of searching to prove im right. im confident that when ive read something important like that, i remember

if i am wrong or the RFL decides to do this, it would be so depressing

all for 100,000 - 150,000 more per club. shameful

Translation
I am clueless. I read it somewhere ..........................


You read it on here.

Meaningful international RL requires NZ, France and Wales to be abke to call on enough full-time pros to compete, even at that there'd only be 6 couintries (including PNG) in the top tier. Therefore you can guarantee the non-heartland clubs will not be dropped, and a second French club will almost certainly get in next time.

Because, as Dave Whelan's said publicly, Wigan's a Rugby League town rather than a soccer one. He can't afford to alienate Wigan's RL fans, he'd be undermining the soccer team if he did.

When did the increase to 1.2 mill happen?
I thought it coincided with the 14 team expansion, could be wrong on that one though?

It did. Bulliac is wrong. No way would the SL clubs have agreed to less money for an expanded league.

you can have 3 french & 3 welsh teams in ESL it will still not help ENG/WAL/FRA to consistently compete with aus/nz.what it could do is give you a GB/FRA lions that might be able to compete them.

Do you not see the contradiction here?


You don't have to. You can just say "this might not be the case, but I've heard..." or something similar, instead of the "I'm right, you're wrong" childish and rather boring thread drifting attitude you bring to every discussion on here.

You have just said your source is an internet forum. You earlier said that the internet has loads of cr*p on it. So despite whether you're confident you've read it or not, it could still be cr*p because it was from an internet forum. And everyone has told you it's cr*p.

So...

Moving on to where your "confidence" seems to be less than you claim in the next post (i.e. "if im wrong"icon_wink.gif, then yes it is a bit sad for just £100-150k extra pa, but understandable in this economic climate. Plus, the player standards and intensity issue is a good one also. There just needs to be a good alternative for those that get thrown out. 10-12 clubs doesn't leave much room for expansion..

its not understandable, its selfish thinking from clubs that should know better.

i seriously hope it doesnt happen. if it does ill change my opinion on lewis.

He'll not sleep at night if he reads this.

the way richard lewis has been running SL so far, i was thinking the nrl should poach him hes that good.

bit like getting promoted from Championship to SL, well take lewis and put him in the big time.