Yes, they are exactly the words that I said; well done you.

That is disgraceful behaviour, but it says more about Argyle as a person . A grovelling unsympathetic apology won’t paper over the cracks of what this person said . https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/david-ar ... ism-20719/

That is disgraceful behaviour, but it says more about Argyle as a person . A grovelling unsympathetic apology won’t paper over the cracks of what this person said . https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/david-ar ... ism-20719/

No it wasn't, thats what you thought you said whilst speaking for others.

It was a racist, not fattist remark. end of discussion.

wonder what the RFL is going to do now as this is a serious complaint, as daft as it seems the club in whole could get serious repercussions ie heavy fine or even points deductions The Tribunal then determine if the Club or individual concerned is guilty of an offence and what the appropriate sanction should be. Sanctioning decisions are made pursuant to the Off-Field Sentencing Guidelines. Sanctions can include: Warnings Fines Suspensions Stadium bans Sporting Sanction, e.g. point deductions. https://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/di ... sciplinary

wonder what the RFL is going to do now as this is a serious complaint, as daft as it seems the club in whole could get serious repercussions ie heavy fine or even points deductions The Tribunal then determine if the Club or individual concerned is guilty of an offence and what the appropriate sanction should be. Sanctioning decisions are made pursuant to the Off-Field Sentencing Guidelines. Sanctions can include: Warnings Fines Suspensions Stadium bans Sporting Sanction, e.g. point deductions. https://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/di ... sciplinary

Alright then wire Quinn do you think Scott Murrell would’ve complained to the RFL if the Bradford chairman made a remark about his weight?

I really don't know hence the question.

Unfortunately on here it seems it's one issue at a time rather than looking more holistically at what is offensive and how each should be dealt with.

Any punishment should be against the person only not the club. If a player had said it they wouldn’t punish the whole club.

He owns the club doesn't he? He is in a position of responsibility and should act in a responsible way for the sake of his organization.

Yes he does and yes he should, that’s why HE should be punished. That last line stands true and the exact same for players and coaches too though.

Err sorry no. When some Trinity idiot let off a flare at Cas a few years ago the club got fined, it wasn't the clubs fault was it, it was twi individuals but thats how it works. Can't just move the goalposts, if that statement he made breaks RFL rules then the club pays the price, whatever that price is.

Frankly its a pee poor bit of behaviour but its surely only a slap on the wrist, lets not blow it out of proportion. The bloke has apologised, he's clearly an idiot as even idiots know that kind of humour (i'm being kind here) is no longer acceptable. It doesn't matter whether in his or your opinion that it's PC gone mad etc etc the fact is society no longer tolerates it and most people are smart enough to accept that, you just can't be too careful.

If I were the RFL I would take another look at this guy before jumping any further into bed with him because that level of crass dumbness does not bode well.

Completely in the wrong is Argyle and definitely needs punishing for it. If I was deeply offended by something though & "never felt so little in my life". I think I'd have reported it straight away & brought it to the presses attention. Not waited nearly 2 months until the weekend my team played his team again.