because some would rather have full house signs, yet not bother about being nilled and humilated at home by the aussie champs!

attendances shouldn't come into it but they will do, there's not many sticks left to beat Huddersfield with.
do you think the Australians will be saying that cronulla, for example, shouldn't take part because they don't fill their stadium every week?

Huddersfield V Cronulla, even if publicised to the hilt with free admission wouldn't fill the stadium.

exactly, and most other clubs wouldn't fill a 24,500 seat stadium either!

Huddersfield should get it.

It shouldn't be up to the RFL to choose a team or for a team to refuse it. It should be a set system.

Should go to Huddersfield, if they get hammered at least it will be in front of the minimum amount of fans. The RL might fancy a gig on humberside so they could give it to the CC runners up Hull K R. Or they could get Leeds to play on Friday, Saturday and Sunday.

Lastly they could give it to Saints on the basis that Saints have won more games than Huddersfield in super league.

Hudds should, by all rights, get it, but I can honestly see Warrington being involved purely for the fact our new season Aussie signings (Sandow, Gidley etc) would create a modicum of interest to the fans down under.

No way they will offer the game to Warrington who finished 6th. Not only do they not deserve it, there would be uproar at Hudds, Saints and even Cas if it happened.

Should go to Huddersfield as they finished 3rd.

Warrington

Salford, just for a giggle.

I'd love to see the Giants play in such a game. Would only be fair and would probably drive people more to grab top 3 and make a better competition in the future.

We win... We get confident in big games (possibly) and grab more fans and add abit more competition to the big teams.

We lose... It'll disrupt our season and we will not make the playoffs, lose to Bradford in the million pound game and a lot of you won't have to complain about our boring tactics anymore.