I'd take all 3 in case one gets injured. As said I wouldn't play Clark as the main hooker as it'd be too big a step for a young lad but I'd use him off the bench.
My first preference as main hooker would be Roby but it's not a big deal if it's McIlorum, they're both good hookers and it won't be at hooker we win or lose the game.

Take 'mickey mac', will be funny watching him get the sh*t kicked out of him by the kiwis and aussies.

Use MM as the punchbag, then bring roby on when they're all punched out.

Roby and MM for me, Smith can cover 9 if needed but Higham can still cut it imo

That's just a fantasy of yours, in reality where the rest of us live, MM is tough enough and good enough to mix it with the Kiwis and Ausies.

I really like Clarke but as others have said his performances in the big games have been below average, maybe he's been let down by his Castleford team mates and maybe he'd be a revelation behind a big English pack, I don't know but the stakes are too high to gamble.

Roby as 1st choice with MM as his foil

No he isn't.

Is there some sort of exam or test all players have to take in order to determine toughness?

Roby and Clark.
Would take Lunt ahead of MM.

Don't see point in havin Roby and MM in same 17 as Roby might as well do 80 minutes. With Clark or Lunt coming off the bench It speeds the ruck up.

Then you woke up in a wet patch.

Handled himself fine in the WCC.

He was crap.

He's shown nothing when he's played for england.

I'd agree with that. Don't like MM much but he is a very good player and if he can control his aggression rather than just being a sh*thouse then i'd pick him over Clark who has done little recently in the 'big' matches.

Roby shouldn't be in question, he should walk into the team. Way better than any other hooker in SL.

who will the two half backs be never mind the hookers!?

smith and brown?