Summarised perfectly.

I'm no fan of Sky's commentary on any of their sports platforms. It's often too loud, too in-yer-face and way too chavvy. It appeals to those of a meat-headed, bigoted and drunken nature who are equipped with little to no intellectual capacity to form their own opinion.

Sky commentary is invariably agenda driven too. Minor incidents are often turned into a continual screaming torrent of brainwashing hyperbole which is then tagged as either fantastic, significant or shocking.

I just wish Phil Clarke could say something without making it sound like he's making an earth shattering point that can not be disputed. He needs to lighten up.

GARBAGE!!

Got to agree but most of the BBC is just has bad

The BBC commentary isn't good but at least it's not in-yer-face like Sky's screaming, ignorant output.

i just think during a video ref decision the only voices that should be heard are the 2 guys viewing the incident , eddy and stevo`s mics should be switched off at this point , hard enough sometimes to get it right without stevo going on about a double movement in your ear

Far too many replays,we end up missing some of the live action

Sky's coverage is pretty damn good to be honest.

It's that idiot Stephenson and his cut 'n' paste commentary. Put another, younger, clued up person next to Eddie if you have to, but please, no more Stevo and his "He knows it" and "He's fully aware".

You dolt.

Regardless of the debate over whether SKY is a good option or not, or whether Thursday night is a good option of not.

I think plenty of people like watching the game on SKY.

Luke Walsh is still trending high UK wise today. So some people must watch it.

"Its as simple as that" Stevo has got to go, very irritating now

Edited for accuracy!!