I miss Headingley, can't wait to get back there in the WC.

I know what you mean, it reminds me of Hilton Park as well, just bigger, a disgrace as regards a SL stadium,

,hello Gary

You never cease to amuse.

You never fail to dissapoint

How is Headingley a disgrace? Combines the beautiful new stand with the traditional old terracing and old-style two-tiered seating stand. It's wonderful.

Some denizens of flat pack stadia have to try and displace their upset at not being able to afford to stay at their beloved spiritual homes.

I agree it is ' state of the art ' , 15% 2000,s state of the art, 85% 1920,s state of the art , it is a dump similar to Wheldon Road and Belle View, only bigger

Since Caddick and Hetherington took over, Leeds have spent about as much upgrading Headingley as it cost to build the Halliwell Jones Stadium. Headingley, unlike the two grounds named, meets the criteria of Framing the Future to the letter, as well as comfortably exceeding the less onerous Super League licencing criteria.

Of course, Headingley is not a brand new stadium and that has its limitations. Leeds could have sold the land for redevelopment and have had a shiny new flat pack place somewhere built for them out of the proceeds or in partnership with a developer (Leeds city council would not have built it - they are less benevolent than other local authorities it seems). But the fans wanted to stay at Rugby League's most historically important ground. So the club has to self finance redevelopment which is a much more onerous task and moves at a slower pace. As it stands however Headingley remains perfectly fit for purpose and no one who knows what they are talking about would ever really seriously suggest otherwise.

"Most historically important ground" ?
This accolade has to go to Odsal,so iconic and important, it was "bought" by the RFL, no other groung has the same status


On a serious note, headingley is much improved but, does need an upgrade at the scoreboard end.

A much smaller scale, but work has started this week on the £500k upgrade of Derwent Park to get it into shape for the RLWC games. The funding is all in place and will improve the cosmetics of the stadium massively.

So basically it has one nice shiny new stand, so it's OK?

It's got obstructions in two of the stands. And the third stand is one of the worst stand in Super League. Shallow steps. No roof. Can barely see the pitch, let alone the screen or scoreboard from certain parts.

The only reason they haven't moved is because Headingley is a great area, and lets be fair, where else is there?!

For starters, the corporate facilities trump any others in Super League - even at the brand new flat-pack football stadiums / council houses. Leeds has invested more than any other club in facilities but, understandably, they've prioritised that investment into areas that generate the most revenue - corporate facilities, retaining Test cricket, bars, conferencing, hotels and educational facilities. The revenue from these will eventually finance the new South Stand and, when YCCC are willing to co-operate, a new North Stand.

What the "roof on the away end" campaigns overlook is that the club has looked into this but, amongst other things, they found that plenty of supporters actually enjoy an open terrace on warm days & evenings. A surprising amount of Leeds season ticket holders have tickets for the Western Terrace for this very reason. Are you suggesting that those core customers should have that choice taken away from them?

Ultimately, Leeds provides plenty of choices to suit whatever tastes people have. Anyone, regardless of their club allegiance, is free to buy a ticket in any area of the ground that they choose.