Either are leeds at the moment.

Quote Wales for super L="Wales for super L":shock: Surely this isnt true! There are some seriously over paid players at the Broncos if it is. www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... eague.html'" You have got to be kidding???? A poster from Wales handing out financial advice.........

Quote Wales for super L="Wales for super L":shock: Surely this isnt true! There are some seriously over paid players at the Broncos if it is. www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... eague.html'" You have got to be kidding???? A poster from Wales handing out financial advice.........

Leeds and Saints are getting great value for money, compared with the Broncos if that's the case

1.65 million doesn't get you a lot in London....certainly not as much as it gets you In St Helelns or Leeds

I remember having a beer in the pub next to KR ahead of the 2003 play-off game.,......Pint of Carlsberg Export and a large lemonade...it cost 1.85. The same drinks in the Griffin at Brentford cost 3.25 in 2003.

Dvorák's New World Symphony in the background?

Much better than hearing a load of blokes in flatcaps belting out On Ilkla Moor Baht 'at.

You is proper angry bruv! I can hear the sirens comin!

Odd...

If London are competitive this season. Especially at Home for lots of reasons. Then spending the 1-65m will be worth it.

Only if people bother to turn up and watch them, if they don't it's hard to see where London go from there.

Most jobs that have a London weighting, its a couple of thousand pounds, it seems in RL its a couple of hundred thousand pounds



I dont buy into the idea London is a less attractive club to players, to the British players that maybe true, but super league is half made up of Aussie's, Kiwi's and pacific islander's, who would find London a much more attractive place to live than the likes of St helens, Warrington, Hull ect

Couple of thousand