Your problem is that this hypothetical situation LifeLongHKRFan wasnt treated as a certainty ? fine...

I've said before, it will be brilliant when the game outgrows leeds. When we get to a point where the major European cities are getting 40k a game and Leeds just can't compete I will be the first in line saying lets merge the West Yorkshire clubs and have at least one able to compete.

Then why spend the time and suffer the aggravation of trying to persuade clubs to merge? It would actually be simpler to start a new club in an untapped area than it would to sell the merger to existing clubs. Or has that been tried and failed so many times that mergers have become the final chuck of the dice?

I dont think it is an either or situation. Why not have both?

So it's simple really , when the sport outgrows the club I follow , I'll be happy to continue watching them in a lower tier , if they don't then survive , I'll do like most Bradford fans are suggesting they'll do , not bother with RL any more

But anyway , if the Bradford club disappear , at least the other clubs in Yorkshire , mostly Leeds probably will gain from it , happy days

In blind idiocy, you have stumbled across the point. The game hasnt outgrown Bradford, The game hasnt moved forward from where Bradford were at all. Bradfords problems arent because they can't keep up with the rate at which the game is moving forward and expanding.

I've put some thought into how I'd do things if I were suddenly put in charge of things. I'm not a business man, and have simply tried to use common sense.

I would return to franchising. I believe this creates the best opportunity to both consolidate existing teams, and grow. I personally believe the current structure creates a lot of uncertainty, which stops top flight clubs from developing talent and encourages championship clubs to mortgage the farm, to borrow a phrase.

I would initially be looking at a 12 team top flight. With all clubs having to reapply for a licence. My criteria for a licence would look something like this:

Does the club posses or have a viable long term option at a suitable playing facility?

Does the club run within its means ie at a profit? If they are a 'sugar daddy' type club,is there a contingency or would they be able to continue to operate should this suddenly change? Basically if is it financially sound.

Does the club attract good gates at home fixtures (minimum 7 thousand plus).

Does the club operate it's own academy? How many academy graduates in the last 5 years (both there and at other clubs) is x percentage of their squad academy graduates.

Is the club involved in the grassroots game?

Is the team competitive on the field.

I'd pick the 12 clubs who fit this bill. I'd run a top 6 playoff system. And play less games, operating a draw like happens in the NRL and NFL (hopefully leaving space for internationals). I'd also look for mid-season internationals as players going on tour leaves others to step up.

Each year or maybe bi-anually If a team in the 'lower league' can reach this standard, then I would look to either expand or replace someone who is perhaps not meeting those standards. (in that sense the top flight is not a closed shop, rather a selective one based on whether teams can operate in or improve the top flight).

I'd also look to raise the salary cap (at least to match inflation since its inception) but lower the overseas quota to 4.

Just my 2 penneth.

If that's the case then the game is in worse health than I thought, as to me that should be what is required for a professional competition that wants to be sustainable long term.

RLs problem for a long time seems to have been far too much short term thinking.

I also note that when these threads come up, people are always quick to ask (normally asking Leeds or Wigan fans) if your team was going to loose a franchise or merge would you support it?

My answer would be yes, as I am a fan of the game first.

I'd also add than if more clubs were like Leeds or Wigan we wouldn't need to have this conversation.

You set the criteria , it's not hard to work through it

Leigh fail , crowds and academy
Cas fail , stadium
Wakey fail , stadium and crowds
Salford fail crowds and academy
Giants fail crowds
Widnes ?

As a Leigh fan , if there are/were 12/14 clubs fitting your criteria then I wouldn't really argue , but until then , you'll just have to put up with us

Didn't the criteria of franchising also include sharing football grounds as being a no no..

Franchising doesn't necessarily have to be the same rules as the previous franchising period. So sharing football grounds would be okay, seen as though all shared football grounds are better than 90% built for RL grounds. Maybe LSV and Halliwell Jones as exceptions.

Nope

But we're discussing Barrie glass eyes criteria

Again Barries glass eyes criteria

And yes it's always been acces to a suitable stadium , access being the operative word

Could I ask then gubrats, which of the criteria put forward would you say should not be the expectation of a fully professional top flight club?

I would perhaps change the wording of the crowd sizes to is it reasonable to expect that a club will be able to attract 7k if in the top flight and competitive. (after all there are extraneous circumstances, but is there the potential for it to happen within a licencing period).

You misunderstand me , all of your criteria is fine , in fact its less than we would/should hope for

But we don't reach it currently , so you have 2 choices , reduce your criteria , or don't have franchising , simple really