well, you clearly are.

]

no thats not what i said AT ALL. I said i was not bragging about being hard, which you insisted i had (when i clearly havent). nowhere have i said i am 'not hard'. I wasnt even ''bragging about being hard' in the first place.
so glad we have sorted that.

]

well, i believe we have just cleared that one up. the basis of your question is not only incorrect, its an outright fabrication.

]

that is actually so insulting and over the top it really doesnt deserve a response.
But what i will do is ask this
Are you into sadism? Do you have some unresolved 'daddy' issues where needlessly beating people with pedantry, misquotes and outright fabrications on message boards gets you off? Do YOU like hospital food? Do YOU have a bad case of small man syndrome? what is it about you that makes you want to put yourself into a position where you will be intensly disliked by those whose posts you respond to with the aforementioned pedantry, misquotes and fabrications? Its natural human instinct to try and find something better to do, or simply not do it in the first place so im interested to find out why you go against it?

Smokey TA .... pwned! (as the young folks say)

no, they are soldiers.
id expect so.
If you were trying, describing Soldiers as trained killers probably isnt the way to go. Every member of the armed services I know would never describe themselves as a 'trained killer' and would be offended if you did so.
I could be a trained killer, and the king of Spain (for all you know)

I can only ask you again. In what way?
So you are neither hard, nor not hard? A strange kind of Human Schrodingeresq paradox. What are you then hard or not hard? Are you challenging Ryan Bailey because you think you have a realistic chance of beating him or because you know he will kick your ass?

My question is a fabrication? no, its quite a real question.
And as such Im sure your not going to respond
ooops
no, not really. yes, my 'Daddy' used to beat me with dictionaries. If i was really naughty he would take out the thesaurus. what can I say, we all have our own little peccadilloes.
No. Its one of a number of reasons I dont wish to challenge Ryan Bailey to a fight. I think its funny, and if your going to do idiotic and nonsensical things like challenge Ryan Bailey to a fight for no real reason, im going to mock you and wind you up.

It's "Schrodingeresque" you illiterate twonk! With an "e" at the end.

(BTW Smokey, why are you obsessed with Ryan Bailey's ass?)

i will admit, my initial comment was a little ill advised, given that its sometimes difficult to communicate tone in writing. it was more tongue in cheek than anything, but it seems certain people just have difficulty interpreting things (waits for indepth and pedantic linguistic analysis of my first comment).
nonetheless and to get back on topic it is blindingly obvious that Ryan Bailey was a vewy bad ickle boy the other night.
any attempt to justify this dyfunctional thugs behaviour is futile.
now, i shall follow the natural human instinct to find something better to do and crack open a bottle of meade, hit the back garden and drink it from my brand new viking drinking horn.

Soldiers are trained to do many, many things. Which is why it is obvious you arent and never have been a soldier.

Its neither. Its not a real word. I just made it up. If I want to spell it Schrodingeresq I can do.

I havent mentioned it once?

there you go. You almost covered it up aswell.

oh yet another gush of quotes. really i do have better things to do. but please, if responding to this makes you happy then go ahead. its increasingly clear you do not have anything better to do. But i will not be reading it.
and your not winding me up. it would take a lot more than you have got. goodbye now.