so you dont know the answer?

thanks for that, its what i suspected

origin isnt just another RL game.

and it would appeal to people who arent just RL fans.

I know that the viewing figures were less than 31,000 which is poor by any means that you wish to measure it by. The exact figure is irrelevant in that context.

Now if you want to interpret that differently and look even more of a t!t than usual then go right ahead Walter.

You're right, played in the UK it would be a game between two teams that UK RL fans have no interest in. It would not appeal to non-RL fans as much as the Challenge Cup final does.

ill bet you dont watch it either.

put it this way, anybody that does wants to watch more of it

well since you are the self appointed expert, how did other programs rate in the same 10 am time slot on a weekday

surely you wouldnt be dumb enough to compare a RL game shown in a poor time slot when people are working to shows in prime time at night?

I do watch it so you'd lose that bet. I hear that less than 31,000 do in the UK though.

Tell me why you think that it would attract people that aren't interested in Rugby League in the UK.

derwent expects half of england to take the day off work to watch origin for it to be deemed a success

you watch it huh?

Yes, I'm a Rugby League fan so I often watch games. What's funny about that? How about you answer my question instead of proving my point about it being a dumb and pointless debate?

Why would it attract people in the UK who aren't interested in RL?

cause its aussie

yeah whilst you are watching origin im watching huddersfield town

go town

for over 100 years . queensland vs new south wales . its fake you do know why they brought in the state of origin ?? dont you

what were the figures of other programs at the same time?