Who?

9 home games per season isn’t enough to sustain clubs.

Instead of doing 2 10 team leagues I’d rather expand it to 1 league of 20 and say that’s it. A franchise model like in the NRL. Play every team once and play the other 9 in your half of the league twice. Total of 28 league games. Top 8 playoff.

Clubs judged on a variety of areas every 5 years but especially marketing/finances etc. If clubs can’t hack it they get dropped down to Championship and have to make their case for re-inclusion in 5 years time.

I'd go with the two. But leave tier 2 to their own devices,let them dictate what tv package they want as individual clubs.

Take the Sky money and run,but don't involve the lower tiers next time round,they will be financially better off than most SL 1 clubs.

This sounds ok, as long as it is executed properly and transparently. Means it doesn't even have to be 20. Can be 14-15 or whatever number, and increase over time if need be.

The top 6 in the championship all need to make clear what their plans are for being a full time club, with teams across all grades. And if the plans are realistic, then let them in.

Everybody talk about....

10 teams is too few. 6 team playoff from 10 is a joke.

Another structure change, joy

Is this actually happening though?

Pop music...........Dooby dooby do wop..........Wop wop do wop

Of course its happening. Are you blind man!

This x100000000.


I don't see why the sport is so against going back to structures that worked in the past. 12 or 14 teams. 1 up, 1 down, 5 team play-offs. Bring the CC games earlier in the season so people more likely to go. Simples.

The damage is already done. Time for change again and stick with it.

Correct.