Bless 'em, little angels tonight weren't they.

And in my opinion it is sounding like you are a little bit jealous thats it not all about your team along with a few rhino fans who are still bitter from last week.

When you beat a team who is only conceding an average of 8points a game with a lot of first team players out it doesn't matter how close the scoreline is it still a massive feat ( and in the context of the game we did teach them a lesson) which just happened to jammed in between a similar line up beating Hull Fc and Salford.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Giants beat us next week considering we never perform well against you unless it means something.

I wouldn't be suprised if hudds win either. Afterall theres no trophy on the line and the game effectively means nothing.

So huddersfield will be in their element.

The Wigan depleted youngsters won at Headingley by putting 50 points on Leeds in 2012........ 2012 GF winners were......????

Quote ThePrinter="ThePrinter"The Wigan depleted youngsters won at Headingley by putting 50 points on Leeds in 2012........ 2012 GF winners were......????'"

And the point of this is?

I didn't deny that it's impressive, though I struggle to see how Leeds were taught a lesson. There's no jealousy here and no reason to be bitter, an under strength Wigan team beat a less under strength Leeds team (still missing our hooker, interchange hooker and the best Centre in the league) in a very close game, and good on them for it. Very impressive. I'm just not quite ready to hand them the double just yet. Does that make me petty?

Talks of score lines and "lessons learnt" sound quite silly given recent past events.

Lemons and grapes, both bitter and sour.

Awful post even by your standards

Whereas yours is very enlightening, thanks. What do you mean by 'my standards' exactly?

How is stating the facts sour grapes or bitterness? I'm genuinely confused by that. I've said that what they've done is very impressive, but do you think they're nailed on for the double, or do you think that 3 or 4 other teams might have quite a big say in that?

yeah and if you follow the line of conversation you would see i was answering to the poster that it hasn't just been poor teams that the youngsters have beaten. or should i mention that a lot of those youngsters are double winners as well or will you get sensitive with that as well?

In a few years time that will be a very expensive team. I wonder what will give.

How fickle the fans are. Just look at the things written about the likes of Gelling, Dudson and especially Hughes a few weeks ago when, on the Cherry and white board, a number of fans were calling for them all to be sold off as soon as possible.