2 minutes progress from your diatribe then, shorty.

You have to have a strange shaped brain to be able to spew enough pap to fill some websites...................

See I have this thing where I feed of the hatred of these people. These unimportant losers no one cares about. People who could speak for days and get no reaction because of their bland, boring, useless comments.

People like Christopher or myself though, we live off your hate. Its like, yes, you are not important, but hate me for the importance I shovel over your heads.

At the end of the day, don't hate us cause you aint us.

Think of the children.

Sorry to spoil your pathetic little ditty,
But it isn't hate we feel,
It's good old fashioned pity.

Oh thats ok, no really, thats fine.

If my live had plummeted to the depths of yours, I'd be full of self pity as well.

Yes, the journo has a shallow view: I've read the links and he focuses on results rather than performance which suggests he's a fan but does not have a deep understanding of the modern game.

He's not alone: Phil Clarke is the only one in the British media (now that Tony Rea's gone) who seems to be able to analyse games. Cullen can't and McRae calls the NRL better than he does SL.

Love you x

Your lack of journalistic knowledge was apparent as soon as you made ridiculous claims about Irvine's inept journalism. The examples you provided links for were 'padding pieces'. Give some examples of RL tactical insight or evocative prose by Irvine....

I have not seen any examples. He is a jobbing hack, clearly more than good enough for the likes of you (no surprise there).

I do not read the quality papers for the RL coverage....but you do

lol