Guys im not being funny but how on earth can you miss Tom Briscoe out, the kid needs to be in that team to push towards full international honours the year after.

He is a machine!!!!!!

Well you have a go at naming a side.

Because every team now has 3 or 4 good kids and it's easy to over look 1

I agree though, he would have been in mine had I remembered.

interesting to see that the emphasis will be on giving the younger and academy players international experience.
could be a an idea to enter the team in the European Cup.
rlhttps://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?t

Off the top of my head:
Emphasis on a young team as well (were possible!).

1 Hall
2 Ainscough
3 Clubb
4 Watkins
5 Briscoe
6 Tomkins
7 Myler
8 LMS
9 McShane
10 L. Burgess
11 Tomkins
12 Ferres
13 Westerman

14 Houghton
15 Eastmond/Lawrence
16 Huby
17 Hargreaves

Briscoe
Briscoe
Lawrence
Clubb
Ainscough
Tomkins
Myler
LMS
Alker
Fielden
Tomkins
Tickle
Westerman

can only really comment on my own team, but Tom Briscoe, Danny Houghton and Craig Hall aren't looking out of place at all in our first team at the moment.

I really don't see the point of an England 'A'. Some people are already moaning that the top players play too many games, why risk burning the younger ones out too in a meaningless tournament. If they're good enough to play international rugby stick them in the main test side.

Exactley, Surely those are the sort of players who'd be contending for an England A slot, unless it was a team made up of players from outside the SL...

BECAUSE THEY ARENT ENGLISH!

Ryan Hall
Tom Briscoe
Martin Lawrence
Ryan Atkins
Shaun Ainscough

Sam Tomkins
Richie Myler

Louise Mcarhty Scarsbrook
Danny Houghton
Luke Burgess
Mke Burnett
Ian Kirke
Joe Westerman

Leroy Cudjoe
Paul Clough
Carl Ablett
Brett Ferres

what meaningless tournament is that?



and then put the best 17 not quite good enough for the main test side in the England A team

no need to shout