Nothing I have posted on the Crusaders fiasco has been made up, it happened, the RFL ploughed hundreds of thousands of pounds through Mr Samuels company to finance the Celtic Crusaders, they advised them how to circumvent the Visa rules, the Crusaders lasted 1 year, 1 season, as we all suggested, it was a complete joke, as is your defence of it

I suppose you have evidence of this? No? What a surprise!

Personally told to me by RFL employees and former Celtic players

Are they the same RFL employees who told you Leigh were banned from running an academy?

Where they the same players who told you the UKBA never reported to the RFL and the RFL never acted on the UKBA's report?

Any of these players or employees made any kind of public comment on these or are they just secrets only you get told in confidence to spread on RL forums when it is convenient for your argument?

What's the difference between the RFL financially assisting Crusaders and the RFL financially assisting London, as you have advocated? Is it because one affected Championship clubs and the other only affects SL clubs?

Why the hypocritical stance?

Do you think Licensing was to blame for Crusaders problems?

No they are not, it was Bill Appleton and Lee Crooks who tried to explain the academy minimum wages excuse back in 2004/5

No they havent made any public comment, probably because that would be incredibly stupid, but you wouldnt understand that, you being either incredibly stupid or incredibly nieve, or both

If the RFL decided to openly admit they were assisting any club, with good reason , then fine, but to attempt to cover up their actions suggests the reasons are not good enough, can you understand that?

I doubt it

yeah, that excuse of the law. So thats the UKBA and employment legislation the RFL are influences. Is there anywhere their tentacles dont extend?
No, i can perfectly understand how making unsubstantiated and unproven accusations of malpractice and corruption for which you have no evidence would be incredibly stupid, and only believed by the incredibly stupid.

Do laws apply to everybody? , if so, why was it only part of a playing squad?

No, laws dont apply to everyone. Thats why a police sniper is allowed a gun, and im not.

Pathetic

I'll simplify it for your simple mind, do employment laws apply to everybody?

Not equally no.

I'll simplify it more for your even simpler mind

Do employment laws apply to people of the same age and experience doing the same job at the same employers ?

No.

Im not sure you are simplifying anything, if anything you just seem to be making your statement more and more specific in the hope we all forget that you are obviously arguing from a false premise.

Its 2009-11 all over again.