FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > Wigan abuse new cap rules already?
157 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach9680
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Badwanger "Begs the question why you needed the "special dispensation" in the first place........'"

they needed it so they could sign all these new players AFTER giving sam tomkins a big pay rise.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2513No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2016Jan 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



All the players we have signed are under the cap as per normal. The only extra above the cap is the difference between Sam Tomkins old contract and Sam Tomkins new contract. If that is too hard for some people to understand then they are pretty stupid icon_lol.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3614No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2018Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Badwanger "Begs the question why you needed the "special dispensation" in the first place........'"

How is it a special dispensation when it applies to all teams? Its just a change to the cap rules to recognise home grown English talent, something which most fans of every team have been calling for for ages.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1696No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Wandering Warrior "All the players we have signed are under the cap as per normal. The only extra above the cap is the difference between Sam Tomkins old contract and Sam Tomkins new contract. If that is too hard for some people to understand then they are pretty stupid
You're right, it's not hard to understand. Wigan ask RFL if they can break the cap and pay Tomkins more money and the RFL let them.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2513No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2016Jan 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Badwanger "You're right, it's not hard to understand. Wigan ask RFL if they can break the cap and pay Tomkins more money and the RFL let them.'"


Thats what happens for the people who are the best at what they do. All other clubs can do the same for their England players too which is bang on. We need a strong England team for the good of the sport.

Would it be better to just let Sam Tomkins go to union? How about if the same happened to Roby, Hall, BJB etc shall we just let them all go?

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner29214No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Wandering Warrior "Would it be better to just let Sam Tomkins go to union? How about if the same happened to Roby, Hall, BJB etc shall we just let them all go?'"


Wigan didn't need the cap exemption in order to keep Sam Tomkins. They should have been forced to cut their cloth accordingly and save in other areas, such as not having 8 NRL players in the starting 13 for example.

Wigan applied for the exemption purely so they could spend more money. They've never been comfortable with a level playing field.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1696No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: inside_man "How is it a special dispensation when it applies to all teams? Its just a change to the cap rules to recognise home grown English talent, something which most fans of every team have been calling for for ages.'"


Of course it's a special dispensation. Just because other Clubs have not applied for it yet does not make it any less of a special dispensation.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach10399No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2016Jul 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Badwanger "In which case they should have plenty of cap space to accommodate any increase in Tomkins salary.

That's not the issue. The issue is that these were signed AFTER the dispensation was granted thus indicating that they did not need the special dispensation in the first place!'"
They didn't need dispensation to mantain a squad of around the same size as last year, but they needed to improve the contract of one of (if not the) RLs premier stars.

Given the guys leaving, they could have given all of that cap space to tomkins, but that would leave them with 5 bodies short of a squad needed to play a SL season. Not even Sam Tomkins can do the job of 5 men (James Roby maybe).

As if Wigan were never going to replace bodies.

I don't know what you're all crying about. Even if they sign this centre, they look a weaker squad than last year, unless you think paying Sam more will make him automatically play better.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2513No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2016Jan 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Saddened! "Wigan didn't need the cap exemption in order to keep Sam Tomkins. They should have been forced to cut their cloth accordingly and save in other areas, such as not having 8 NRL players in the starting 13 for example.

Wigan applied for the exemption purely so they could spend more money. They've never been comfortable with a level playing field.'"


We have saved in other areas. Look at the players who have left and the ones that have come in. The ones that left would of been payed much more as a collective than the ones that have come in.

8 NRL in the starting 13? icon_lol.gif Thats not true either unless you are picking the team for us?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3614No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2018Nov 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Offside Monkey "They didn't need dispensation to mantain a squad of around the same size as last year, but they needed to improve the contract of one of (if not the) RLs premier stars.

Given the guys leaving, they could have given all of that cap space to tomkins, but that would leave them with 5 bodies short of a squad needed to play a SL season. Not even Sam Tomkins can do the job of 5 men (James Roby maybe).

As if Wigan were never going to replace bodies.

I don't know what you're all crying about. Even if they sign this centre, they look a weaker squad than last year, unless you think paying Sam more will make him automatically play better.'"

Exactly, it's not as if we planned to sign Sam and then when we got the exemption we went out and found 5 players.

These players will have been lined up for ages, knowing that we needed replacements for people leaving, just because they were announced after Tomkins pay rise doesn't mean they actually came as a second thought. They were in the pipeline long before the payrise.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1696No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Offside Monkey "Given the guys leaving, they could have given all of that cap space to tomkins, but that would leave them with 5 bodies short of a squad needed to play a SL season. '"


If it did leave them five bodies short (which is highly debatable) then it's up to them to manage the cap better and promote from within.

Quote: Offside Monkey "I don't know what you're all crying about. '"


My argument is that given the fact that many players are leaving AND that they have signed players AFTER the dispensation proves, beyond reasonable and logical doubt, that Wigan did not actually need any special dispensation at all and merely used the excuse that Tomkins *may* go to union as a stick to beat the RFL into submission over a cap increase.

Quote: Offside Monkey "Even if they sign this centre '"

He won't be coming over for brass washers that's for sure - thus proving they did not need the "extra" cap space

Quote: Offside Monkey " they look a weaker squad than last year, '"

That's irrelevant.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1696No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: inside_man "Exactly, it's not as if we planned to sign Sam and then when we got the exemption we went out and found 5 players.

These players will have been lined up for ages, knowing that we needed replacements for people leaving, just because they were announced after Tomkins pay rise doesn't mean they actually came as a second thought. They were in the pipeline long before the payrise.'"


In which case, why not announce them *before* the Tomkins ruling?

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner7779
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200421 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Offside Monkey "They didn't need dispensation to mantain a squad of around the same size as last year, but they needed to improve the contract of one of (if not the) RLs premier stars.

Given the guys leaving, they could have given all of that cap space to tomkins, but that would leave them with 5 bodies short of a squad needed to play a SL season. Not even Sam Tomkins can do the job of 5 men (James Roby maybe).

As if Wigan were never going to replace bodies.

I don't know what you're all crying about. Even if they sign this centre, they look a weaker squad than last year, unless you think paying Sam more will make him automatically play better.'"


Exactly.

If the rules weren't changed Wigan would have had 2 x options

1/ Give ST the money, and then play with a ridiculously low Squad (Been there done that, not a great idea) as they are tied into existing contracts. Let other youngsters leave to experience their system of bringing youth through that if it was any good they wouldn't need the young Wigan lads in the first place!

2/ Not give him the money and then use ST's existing money to reinvest in other signings to replace him and see ST join Union along with his Brother which benefits nobody in RL than the Narrow Minded Wigan hating Brigade!

Does anyone for 1 minute not think that Wigan had most of these signings lined up most of last year (I knew about 3 of them back in August!) but needed to wait on the agreements of the new rules that if I'm not mistaken probably 90% of people on here have been calling for the last 3/4 years? If the rules hadn't been agreed we would have either not signed these new players or Sam would have gone.
Quite simple really.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner7779
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200421 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Badwanger "In which case, why not announce them *before* the Tomkins ruling?'"


Because maybe they wouldn't have signed them and still given ST the pay increase.

They waited until they knew which option they had and then acted!

If theyd have signed these 5 players (I take it certain posters are delibarately choosing not to highlight the players leaving as to make it look like Wigan have signed 5 extra players from last year!) and then the rules hadn't been brought in and lost ST to Union then I'm sure you would have been saying how stupid Wigan were in signing them without securing their prize asset.
As it is they've done a shrewd bit of business and you don't like it.

It's the internet equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and telling everyone I'm going to sqweem and sqweem and sqweem!

Your not fooling anyone

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach1696No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2012Feb 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Jukesays "Exactly.

If the rules weren't changed Wigan would have had 2 x options

1/ Give ST the money, and then play with a ridiculously low Squad (Been there done that, not a great idea) as they are tied into existing contracts. Let other youngsters leave to experience their system of bringing youth through that if it was any good they wouldn't need the young Wigan lads in the first place! '"


That is *exactly* what should have happened but I'd argue that it would allow even more Wigan youngsters to come to the fore rather than leave.

Quote: Jukesays "2/ Not give him the money and then use ST's existing money to reinvest in other signings to replace him and see ST join Union along with his Brother which benefits nobody in RL than the Narrow Minded Wigan hating Brigade!'"


Firstly, I'm glad ST is staying in RL - thought I need to make that clear.

Secondly, given the amount of players leaving and the difference in the quality of those player coming in, I fail to see why Wigan needed this dispensation in the first place - surely even the most ardent of Wigan fan can see that?

Quote: Jukesays "Does anyone for 1 minute not think that Wigan had most of these signings lined up most of last year (I knew about 3 of them back in August!) '"


I'm not saying that for one minute but that Wigan have been utterly cynical and fed the RFL a line and they have fallen for it, hook, line and sinker.

The fact Wigan are STILL being linked with yet another player - who let's face it, if true, won't be being paid peanuts - just further emphasis the fact that Wigan have played the RFL for fools on this one.

Quote: Jukesays "but needed to wait on the agreements of the new rules that if I'm not mistaken probably 90% of people on here have been calling for the last 3/4 years? '"


I'm not debating the merits/flaws of the ruling, I'm debating whether it was necessary at all given the comparison of Ins and Outs of the Wigan squad this coming year and the fact that Wigan are still in talks with other players who may, or not, have been approached by them before the ST ruling.

Quote: Jukesays "If the rules hadn't been agreed we would have either not signed these new players or Sam would have gone. Quite simple really.'"


I'm not convinced it's as clear cut as you are trying to make out.

157 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint
157 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Durham Giant , TimperleySaint



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


6.25341796875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Armavinit
4040
Recent
Film game
karetaker
5733
Recent
Game - Song Titles
Cokey
40790
Recent
Salford
karetaker
52
Recent
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
Recent
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
Recent
Salford placed in special measures
FIL
106
Recent
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Bent&Bon
6
Recent
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
MjM
21
Recent
Pre Season - 2025
Irregs#16
188
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
508
1m
Accounts
Tony Fax
141
1m
Castleford sack Lingard
Another Cas
16
2m
Salford
karetaker
52
4m
2025 Recruitment
Rattler13
204
5m
Salford placed in special measures
FIL
106
6m
Ground Improvements
Trojan Horse
188
6m
Pre Season - 2025
Irregs#16
188
7m
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
10m
IMG Score
Bull Mania
83
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
4
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
Jack Burton
4
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
Trojan Horse
36
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
karetaker
52
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
TODAY
Leeds away first up
FIL
50
TODAY
Jake McLoughlin
Wanderer
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
2025 Betfred Super League Fixt..
1032
Magic Weekend 2025 - Back To N..
636
England Beat Samoa To Take Tes..
1363
England's Women Demolish The W..
1187
England Beat Samoa Comfortably..
1428
Operational Rules Tribunal –..
1210
IMG-RFL club gradings released..
1472
Wakefield Trinity Win Champion..
2009
Hunslet Secure Promotion After..
2217
Trinity Into Play Off Final Af..
2460
Wigan Warriors Crowned Champio..
2024
York Valkyrie Win Back to Back..
2265
Hunslet Book Relegation Play O..
2732
Penrith Panthers Secure Fourth..
2156
Wigan Humiliate Leigh For Gran..
2233