Id go with Tomkins briscoe yeaman bridge and hall.

I will take your word for it mate as cant get on said website it work!!

Is there ant glimmer of hope that he will choose England!?!

hope? you wanna pin hope on a lad who was laying brick last year and has only played 23? first grade games

he's only got his chance because of the lack to 3/4 talent coming through the NRL..his 50m solo "miracle" try he scored against melbourne owed itself more to shocking tackling tha wonderful play..the last melbourne storm defender bloody runs away from him!!!

Definatly Tomkins at full back with Yeaman and Briscoe the left centre/wing partnership.

Then on the other side:

Wingers - Hall, Charnley or Jones Bishop.
Centres - Tomkins, Bridge, Cudjoe or Watkins.

Cudjoe and Charnley for my money

Cant see any problem with that. Cudjoe is great in attack and standard in defence and Charnley is good in defense and a good finisher.

I do think McGillvray should be given a chance though. Great talent but might be a year too early for him.

its nice to see a good argument about the relative strengths of a couple of very good left wingers eligable for england.

anyone remember when we were so lacking in that dept we had to play richard horne there?

Ah forgot McGillvary, another contender.

Gerry also has a very very good attacking kick on him too, able to put the ball back inside for the likes of Tomkins (s)

Aye, seen him do it a few times this season, never seems to panic unlike some other wingers.

I think that I'd fancy

Tomkins
Briscoe
Yeaman
Bridge
Hall

with Cudjoe in the squad as backup, as I rate him at both centre and wing.



We've got some quality young threequarters now, plenty of potential.

All of these are 25 or under:

FB: Tomkins, Widdop, BJB
W: Briscoe, Hall, McGilavray, Charnley,
C: Watkins, Cudjoe, Shenton, Arundel

This doesn't include Atkins, Foster, Broughton, Owen, and Welham who I think are good but won't get to a level good enough for internation rugby.

]

I put Shenton in front of him due to the fact that I thought that he played impressively in last years 4 nations.

I put Arundel in front of him because I feel that he has more potential than Welham and will get to a higher standard.

I'm not calling Welham a bad player, if I thought that then I wouldn't mention him, but I think that he won't get to an international standard due to his suspect defense.

The lists towards the end that included players such as Watkins and Arundel was not the list of people that I thought should be in contention for this years internationals, but people who I think will feature for England over the coming years, due to being young (all 25 and under) and having great ability/potential.

Your opinion. But I've seen alot of him this year, and let's face it, Rovers have hardly been ripping up trees this year, and he's still the leading try scorer In the league. Says alot about the kid. Hope Mcnamara see's sence and puts him the team based on form as he said he would!