The correct decision. To call it a salary cap breach to gain an advantage is simply absurd.

The numbers were so small that deducting points was just way too harsh.

what is the point of having rules

Surely you see the difference in say a club being £100k over the cap which pays annual salaries rather than figures Wigan were declared to be over the cap.

They broke the rules and were punished for that its just a points deduction was deemed to severe.

Not really, no.

question did wigan go over the cap or not yes or no

I'll answer it for you puroresu_boy it was a yes not much but a yes so the rules are a fine and points deduction but wigan being wigan have to bleat on to get they way, if they was a quid over its breaching the cap

the only good thing that has come out of it is leeds are closer to the bottom and shudds are nailed to the bottom

So if you're going 31mph in a 30 zone, you should get the same punishment as going 90 in a 30 zone?

If you were up in court for a 3rd offence you wouldn't get a suspended sentence. If it was drink driving it would matter not how little you were over the limit.....you'd be jailed.

the RFL are now looking into the London v Wigan game to see if the can overturn the result and give them the two points as the only just lost by a close margin

no but when you park on a double yellow expect a fine

Which is why i used an example of a tiered penalty system, which the salary cap is based on...

And your 3rd offence should come into the tier....meaning even an upheld 2 point deduction is lenient considering Wigans recidivism.