He certainly had something to say when Clark was down.

he did indeed despite there being no foul play involved.

even cummings won't say it was red! embarrassing

A potentially really good game being ruined by a weak ref here.

I think we need to rethink the red card because refs are terrified of using it.

Edit: Jesus, he's just called held after the play-the-ball.

has he ever not spoilt a game?

The 3 officials may as well be in Warrington shirts.

I don't like saying that, especially as a biased fan, as we all are, but leeds aren't getting much. that's sport though.
what worries me is the awful standard of officiating week in week out

What's a player got to do to get a red these days?

So a bottled red, a ridiculously one sided penalty count, an invented knock on against ratchford, a missed leeds forward pass followed by a call against a very marginal Wire one, a nonexistent tackle in the air, a call of held after the play the ball and now a try which was knocked on.

How tf was that sent up as a try? It the VR isn't there, Child overrules the TJ and awards that try. Very worrying.

i'm reallt not sure.

as someone who reffed professional football there are so many things wrong with his game. he never seems focused, the game seems to go on around him and his concentration level is awful. he never looks in control of a game, never looks assured and competant

the frustrating thing is that i think both teams have played really well. I think standard wise it has been one of the best games in SL for a while. Few mistakes, good defence, some good skill but the ref has had more influence on it than anyone.

Westwood's challenge on Sutcliffe should have been a straight red - probably saved by it been in the first minute.

id also throw out that i think Patton has played really well. Showing up some of his more experienced colleagues.

macdermotts 3 prop policy is paying dividends again