Your obsession with Harlequins is noted

You're missing the point, but then I suppose that isn't surprising.

Well what is your point??

How can to poor teams be sat in the play off places is that your point? It's been lost in your inane ramblings

The point is you've long lost the arguement, just let it go.



Oh and Quins shouldn't be in SL.

Can you really not see it? If you take a moment to calm down, look back on the thread, and you'll the point is that both Hull FC and Hull KR play unattractive Rugby, and that the game was a poor one. Unfortunately some posters are too wrapped up in their own club and unable to construct a decent response, and their only possible retaliation is a random attack on another team.

Why is anybody bothering to reply to Lister? Starve him of the attention he craves and he'll wither and die (metaphorically, of course).

To be honest i got bored along time ago so just skipped to the last page of the thread. It's been said for along time that Rovers play to a set game plan and very rarely move from that, a workman like side if you will. We've scored some good ones at times this year though but i'd guess we are far more dangerous from 20 metres out than 80

He does have a point though.

Just because Hull is a city where Rugby League is very popular it doesnt mean your 2 teams have to be good at it.


Its a bit like England and Soccer.

But it's still not been explained how two teams in play-off positions are poor sides.

Sadly shouts volumes about the quality of the opposition.

I love it, I post something that others do not like, and some agree with, and I am accused of seeking attention. I therefore think your excessive posting on the gym thread is attention seeking.

Yeah cos the likes of Saints, Wire, Wigan, Leeds etc are terrible aren't they.

Fair enough.

See everyone, it's not that hard to construct a sensible response?